#1. Why were the French determined to prevent British colonies from expanding westward?
#2. Which Native American groups sided with the British and which sided with the French as the war began? Why?
#3. What arguments did the British have against the colonial resistance to the Stamp Act? What was the colonial argument against the Stamp Act?
#4. Why did John Adams choose to defend the British soldiers?
#5. Explain how the Sons of Liberty helped warn the colonists when the British set out from Boston to cross the Charles River.
#6. How did Washington use the physical geography of Boston to defeat the British?
I don't care about answers just links and pg's in the book that can help me.
I entered your first question in Google and got the following results. You can do this, too, and it'll be faster than waiting for a tutor who's willing to Google your questions!
https://www.google.com/search?q=Why+were+the+French+determined+to+prevent+British+colonies+from+expanding+westward%3F&oq=Why+were+the+French+determined+to+prevent+British+colonies+from+expanding+westward%3F&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60.1401j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
thanks Writeatcher
You're welcome!
1. The French were determined to prevent British colonies from expanding westward due to several reasons. Firstly, they wanted to protect their own territorial claims in North America, particularly in the Ohio River Valley. The French had established a profitable fur trade network in this region and feared that British expansion would disrupt their economic interests. Additionally, they sought to maintain a balance of power and limit British influence on the continent, as they viewed the British colonies as a growing threat to French holdings in Canada and Louisiana.
To find information about why the French were deterred from British colonies expanding westward, you can start by researching the historical context of the French and Indian War, also known as the Seven Years' War. Look for primary and secondary sources that discuss the motivations and concerns of the French during this time.
2. During the French and Indian War, various Native American groups aligned themselves with either the British or the French. Several tribes, such as the Iroquois Confederacy, the Mohawk, the Cayuga, the Onondaga, the Seneca, and the Tuscarora, sided with the British. This choice was influenced by their long-standing trade and diplomatic relationships with the British and their desire to resist French expansion into their territories.
On the other hand, tribes like the Algonquin, the Huron-Wendat, and many other tribes in the Great Lakes and Ohio River Valley regions, sided with the French. These tribes saw the French as valuable partners in the fur trade and recognized that a French victory would help them maintain their independence against British encroachment.
To find out more about which Native American groups sided with the British and which sided with the French, you can explore historical records, accounts, and narratives of the time. Look for primary sources such as letters, treaties, and firsthand accounts from individuals on both sides.
3. The British government had several arguments against colonial resistance to the Stamp Act. They believed that the colonies should contribute to the costs of maintaining the empire and felt that the tax on stamped paper and documents was a fair way to raise revenue. Furthermore, they argued that the colonists benefited from British protection and should bear their share of the financial burden.
On the other hand, colonial arguments against the Stamp Act centered around the issue of representation. The colonists argued that they were being taxed without their consent, as they had no representation in the British Parliament. They believed that only their own colonial assemblies had the right to levy taxes on them. The colonists also viewed the Stamp Act as a violation of their rights and freedoms as English subjects.
To understand the arguments made by the British and the colonial resistance to the Stamp Act, you can consult primary sources such as colonial newspapers, pamphlets, and speeches. Additionally, you can review historical documents like the Stamp Act itself and speeches made in the British Parliament during that time.
4. John Adams chose to defend the British soldiers involved in the Boston Massacre because he believed in upholding the principles of justice and providing a fair trial to all individuals, regardless of their affiliations or actions. Adams saw it as a vital component of a functioning legal system and a safeguard against mob rule.
By taking on the case, Adams aimed to demonstrate that the American colonies were not lawless and that they embraced the principles of due process and the right to a defense. He believed that a fair trial would ensure justice was served and provide an opportunity to showcase the principles upon which the colonies were founded.
To understand why John Adams chose to defend the British soldiers, you can study his writings and biographies that discuss his motivations and principles. Look for primary sources such as letters or personal writings by John Adams, as well as secondary sources that analyze his role in the Boston Massacre trial.
5. The Sons of Liberty played a crucial role in warning the colonists when the British set out from Boston to cross the Charles River. They were a group of American colonists who opposed British policies and played an active role in protests and resistance efforts. They used secret signals and communication networks to relay information and warn the colonists of impending British actions.
In the specific case of the British crossing the Charles River, the Sons of Liberty employed a system of lantern signals in the Old North Church. They arranged for two lanterns to be hung in the church steeple, signifying that the British would be crossing the river by sea. This signal alerted nearby towns and communities that the British were on the move, providing them with valuable time to prepare and respond.
To learn more about how the Sons of Liberty helped warn the colonists, you can explore historical records, accounts, and narratives from that period. Look for primary sources such as letters, diaries, or newspapers that document the actions and efforts of the Sons of Liberty.
6. George Washington utilized the physical geography of Boston to his advantage in order to defeat the British during the Revolutionary War. He positioned his troops on higher ground surrounding the city, such as Dorchester Heights, which provided a strategic vantage point and made it difficult for the British to attack.
Washington also strategically placed artillery on these elevated positions, enabling his forces to control and bombard the city and its harbor. By occupying these high positions, he compelled the British to either engage in a direct assault, which would have been costly, or to evacuate Boston altogether.
To understand how George Washington used the physical geography of Boston to defeat the British, you can explore historical accounts, military strategies, and analyses of the Siege of Boston. Look for primary sources such as reports from Washington or other military commanders involved, as well as secondary sources that discuss the tactics used by Washington during this campaign.