How can readers distinguish between prejudicial and non-prejudicial use of rhetorical devices?

Here's a previous answer to this question.

Posted by Ms. Sue on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 at 6:03pm in response to CREATIVE WRITING.

This question has been asked and answered here several times in the last few weeks.

Rhetorical devices are designed to evoke certain emotions from the readers. That fact in itself makes rhetorical devices prejudicial. In other words, authors who use rhetorical devices do so to arouse emotions. They want the reader to prejudge a situation.

If you know of any non-prejudicial use of a rhetorical device, please post it -- and we'll discuss it.

For more information about rhetorical devices, please read these sites.

http://www.virtualsalt.com/rhetoric.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_device

This question has been answered in length. Check this site also

http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1165364759.1165365616

To distinguish between prejudicial and non-prejudicial use of rhetorical devices, readers can follow these steps:

1. Understand the purpose of rhetorical devices: Rhetorical devices are language techniques that writers use to effectively communicate their ideas and persuade the audience. It is essential to recognize that these devices are meant to evoke emotions and influence the reader's perspective.

2. Evaluate the intent of the author: Consider the author's purpose and intention when using a particular rhetorical device. Is the author using it to inform, entertain, or persuade? Assess whether the author is trying to present a balanced view or if they are actively trying to manipulate the reader's emotions and opinions.

3. Analyze the content and context: Pay attention to the specific words, phrases, or techniques employed in the text. Does the author use loaded language or persuasive techniques that rely heavily on emotion rather than logical reasoning? Does the author present multiple perspectives or only focus on one side of the argument? Understanding these subtleties can help determine whether the use of rhetorical devices is prejudicial or non-prejudicial.

4. Seek additional perspectives: Read multiple sources and interpretations of the text to gain a broader understanding of its intended message. By considering different viewpoints, readers can identify any biases or prejudices present in the rhetorical devices used by the author.

5. Reflect on personal bias: Be aware of your own preconceived notions and biases when assessing the use of rhetorical devices. Recognize that your own beliefs may influence your interpretation of whether a device is prejudicial or non-prejudicial. Reflecting on your own perspective allows for a more objective evaluation.

By following these steps, readers can develop a critical eye when analyzing the use of rhetorical devices in texts, helping them distinguish between prejudicial and non-prejudicial instances.