Post your response to the following: Of the two arguments provided in the digital story, which is valid and which is sound? When you are building an argument for an issue that is significant to you, do you think it is more important to be valid or sound? Explain your answer.

Deductivity (or validness if that what you still want to call it) means that given some premises the conclusion must hold true. Soundess means that all the components involved are actually true. One can have a deduction (or be valid) without being sound. One can have something that is sound without having a deduction (or being valid).

For that third declarative statement, the sentence should have read one can *not* have . . . Oops! My bad!

The vacuum salesman’s argument was, “Anyone who wants a comfortable, clean home needs this amazing vacuum cleaner. You certainly look like someone who likes having a really clean home. So, you definitely need this vacuum cleaner!” The salesman did have a valid argument. But what if the man that he is trying o sell to does not like having a clean home? What if it isn’t even him that is responsible for cleaning the home, the salesman doesn’t’ know that. The salesman’s argument’s conclusion can only be true if the premises of the argument are true.



I think the wife makes the sound argument. It’s sound or valid because everything she states is true. It all makes sense from a logical point of view. The premise of the wife’s argument was the fact that the carpet was already clean and that the vacuum they currently have is in good working condition. Why would you replace something that is in good working condition? There is nothing wrong with it.



In that rare occasion when I need to have an argument ready, it is always a sound argument. It is a type of argument whose premises are all true. I’m not a big fan of arguing or debating or anything similar to it. When people argue, I usually just sit there and let it play out. But when that time comes around that I have to throw in my two cents, I like to be sure that I know what it is that I am talking about.

In the future how will critical thinking influence the ways that you: a) Read? b) Write? C.) Process Information?

II. Why and how could you apply critical thinking when evaluating each of the following: a) Articles? b) Advertising? c)Media? d) Conversations?

checkpoint1 week 7 argument validity

To determine which argument in a digital story is valid and which is sound, it is important to understand the definitions of these terms within the context of logic and argumentation.

Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument. An argument is considered valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, if the premises were true, then the conclusion must also be true. A valid argument does not necessarily guarantee the truth of the conclusion, but it ensures that the conclusion is logically consistent with its premises.

Soundness, on the other hand, goes beyond validity by adding an additional requirement: the premises of a sound argument must be true. So, a sound argument is both valid and its premises are true. If an argument is sound, it is not only logically valid but also based on true premises, making its conclusion more reliable and strong.

Now, when considering which is more important when building an argument for an issue that is significant to you, it depends on the purpose and context of the argument.

If your primary goal is to persuade others and win their support, it may be more crucial to focus on soundness. By ensuring that your premises are true, you establish a strong foundation for your argument and increase its overall credibility. In most cases, people are more likely to accept and be persuaded by arguments that are based on true and accurate information.

On the other hand, if you're more interested in the logical structure and coherence of your argument, validity becomes the primary concern. A valid argument demonstrates logical consistency, regardless of the truth or falsity of its premises. It allows you to make logically valid deductions and form logical connections between ideas.

In some situations, both validity and soundness are equally important. For example, in academic or scientific settings, both the logical structure and the truth of premises are usually scrutinized. It is expected that arguments are not only valid but also based on accurate and valid evidence. In such cases, it is crucial to strive for both validity and soundness to maximize the effectiveness and reliability of your argument.

In conclusion, the importance of validity and soundness when building an argument depends on the context and purpose of the argument. While validity ensures logical consistency, soundness adds the additional requirement of true premises. If persuading others is the main goal, soundness becomes more important. However, in situations where logical structure and coherence are emphasized, validity is crucial. Ultimately, striving for both validity and soundness can lead to stronger and more convincing arguments.