please check my answers at the bottom

Parliament Member Argues Against Repeal (January 23, 1766)

The only shadow of an argument, that can be brought to support the repeal of the Stamp Act, is that our trade with that country will suffer, if we enforce the tax with spirit and rigour. I grant it will—but what then? It will suffer only for a time; and this necessary severity will support and secure it for the future. Whereas if the tax is repealed, it will give a blow to our trade, that will be felt for ages—it will open a channel to the Americans for a free commerce with all the world: The manufactures of this country will be rejected, in proportion as other nations underwork, and undersell us: In short, America will be no longer British, but German, French, Spanish, Russian—and what not? Forbid it Heaven, that I should live to see the day, when a country, which has cost us so much blood and treasure to defend, will be made the bubble of popularity, or the plaything of power; liable to be blown away by vanity on one hand, or lost, by childish weakness and timidity, on the other.
...
The Americans imbibe notions of independence and liberty with their very milk, and will some time or other shake off all subjection. If we yield to them in this particular, by repealing the Stamp-Act, it is all over; they will from that moment assert their freedom. Whereas if we enforce the Act, we may keep them in dependence for some years longer: they are not yet in a condition to resist us—they cannot live without our manufactories ...
From: Prologue to the Revolution

1. What is the purpose of the document?to persuade people to keep the stamp act
2. What is the viewpoint of the author?he believes the stamp act helps the people and will be good in the future.
3. Is there bias in the document?yes the author wants the stamp act because he is a parliament member.

1. The purpose of the document is to argue against the repeal of the Stamp Act and persuade people to keep it in place.

2. The viewpoint of the author is that the Stamp Act is necessary and beneficial for trade and the future security of British possessions.

3. Yes, there is bias in the document. The author, being a Parliament member, supports the Stamp Act and argues in favor of its enforcement. This indicates a bias towards maintaining the Act rather than repealing it.

1. The purpose of the document is to argue against the repeal of the Stamp Act and persuade people to keep it in place.

To determine the purpose of a document, it is important to analyze the content and context of the document. In this case, the author argues against repealing the Stamp Act and presents reasons to support this position. This suggests that the purpose of the document is to persuade readers to maintain the Stamp Act.

2. The viewpoint of the author is in favor of keeping the Stamp Act and enforcing it with "spirit and rigour."

To determine the viewpoint of an author, it is essential to examine the language, arguments, and tone used in the document. In this case, the author supports the enforcement of the Stamp Act, arguing that although it may initially cause some negative effects on trade, it will ultimately support and secure trade for the future. The author also emphasizes the importance of preserving British control over the American colonies. These arguments demonstrate the author's viewpoint in favor of the Stamp Act.

3. Yes, there is bias in the document. The author, being a Parliament member, has a vested interest in supporting the Stamp Act.

To identify bias in a document, it is important to consider the potential motivations and interests of the author. In this case, the author is identified as a Parliament member, suggesting that they have a role in deciding and enforcing legislation such as the Stamp Act. Given their position, the author's support for the Stamp Act can be seen as biased, as it aligns with their own interests and agenda as a lawmaker.