After the French and Indian War, the British issued the Royal Proclamation of 1763, which forbade colonists from moving into lands west of the Appalachian Mountains.
Which most accurately explains colonists’ reaction to this policy as outlined in the Declaration of Independence?
They objected to the king’s decision to limit colonization of the area because it led to increased attacks from Native Americans.
They rejected the king’s decision to limit the expansion of the colonies and viewed it as an act of tyranny.
They accepted the king’s right to limit the expansion of the colonies, but rejected his use of military force to do so.
They rebelled against the king’s decision to limit colonization of the area and appealed to the French government to intervene.
B?
I agree.
Thank you :)
You're welcome.
The most accurate explanation for colonists' reaction to the British policy of forbidding expansion into the lands west of the Appalachian Mountains, as outlined in the Declaration of Independence, is option B: They rejected the king's decision to limit the expansion of the colonies and viewed it as an act of tyranny.
To arrive at this answer, we can analyze the stated reasons in the Declaration of Independence, which was a document drafted in 1776 by the American colonies to proclaim their independence from British rule. The Declaration listed a series of grievances against the British government, and one of them was the restriction on westward expansion. The colonists considered this limitation as an infringement on their rights and an act of tyranny by the British king, as they believed they had the natural right to settle and expand into new territories.
Therefore, option B correctly reflects the colonists' objection to the king's decision and their view of it as an act of tyranny.