I had to compare and contrast two personality theories and would like if someone could give me some constructional feedback.
When compared Psychodynamic theory and Humanistic theory they both try to define why we do what we do as humans, and why we choose what we do. Humanistic theory believes that we are not influenced by internal or external forces. Psychodynamic theory believes that our actions are a result of our id. Humanistic approach focuses on the ability to choose our own actions but being held responsible for those actions. Psychodynamic theory suggests that Id causes aggression and is terrible. Humanistic theorists put an emphasis on an individual conquering problem, while Psychodynamic theorists believe that the unconscious is the core of one’s actions. Humanistic theory suggests that people are primarily good, which contrasts the psychodynamic theory. Humanistic theorists put an emphasis on an individual conquering problem. These theorists believe in self actualization or living up to one’s full potential, which is easily done by meeting basic needs then moving on to more complex objective, both theories include reasoning that states how one is prone to behave a certain way if treated a certain way as a child. Both theories represent psychology, the study of the human mind. Each has its own explanation of personality and ways to manage mental conditions that occur. Through study and observation we may be able to build on each theory and determine what works best for each different individual.
Humanistic Theory And Psychodynamic Theory. Anti Essays. Retrieved February 1, 2009, from the World Wide
To provide constructive feedback on your comparison of psychodynamic theory and humanistic theory, here are a few suggestions:
1. Clarify and elaborate on the key concepts: Although you have touched upon the main ideas of the theories, it would be helpful to provide clearer definitions and explanations of terms such as "id," "self-actualization," and "unconscious." This will improve the reader's understanding of the theories.
2. Organize your points: The comparison seems a bit disorganized, with some ideas repeated and others not clearly connected. To improve the flow, you might consider grouping similar points together and ensuring that each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the theories.
3. Provide evidence or examples: While you have made some general statements about the theories, it would enhance your comparison if you provided specific examples or referenced studies that support or illustrate the ideas. This will add more depth and credibility to your analysis.
4. Balance the comparison: It appears that more emphasis has been given to the humanistic theory, with some points repeated or not fully explored for the psychodynamic theory. Try to maintain a balanced analysis by devoting equal attention to both theories and their respective strengths and weaknesses.
5. Conclusion: Your conclusion could be strengthened by summarizing the main points of the comparison and offering some final thoughts on the implications and potential applications of the theories.
Overall, your comparison provides a decent overview of psychodynamic theory and humanistic theory. By implementing these suggestions, you can enhance the clarity, organization, and depth of your analysis.