Which of the following might a limited government be more likely to do than an unlimited government? A. build and maintain public roads B. protect citizens from attack C. operate public schools D. let citizens speak freely and protest

Love joy missed the last question the answers here are

1 let citizens speak freely and protest
2 to maintain law and order in a country
3 negotiating treating and appealing to international court’s
4 under a federal system power is shared among different levels of government
5 Legislative: passes laws

1 let citizens speak freely and protest

2 to maintain law and order in a country
3 negotiating treating and appealing to international court’s
4 under a federal system power is shared among different levels of government
5 Legislative: passes laws
100% for 7th grade Connexus
Credit goes to Love Joy is kinda correct

The answers are

1. let citizens speak freely and protest
2. to maintain law and order in a country
3. negotiating treaties, appealing to international courts
4. Under a federal system, a small group of people holds most government power
5. Legislative: passes laws

I promise these are right, I didn't put the letters Incase the position of the answers change btw

thank you guys TOT you saved my grade

To determine which of the following options a limited government might be more likely to do than an unlimited government, we need to understand what defines a limited government and an unlimited government.

A limited government is one where the powers and actions of the government are restricted by a constitution or other governing documents. The primary aim of a limited government is to protect individual rights and freedoms, while also providing essential services to its citizens.

On the other hand, an unlimited government, also known as an authoritarian or totalitarian government, has the authority to control all aspects of its citizens' lives without any restrictions. These governments have vast powers and often ignore individual rights and freedoms.

Now let's evaluate the given options in this context:

A. Build and maintain public roads: Both limited and unlimited governments can build and maintain public infrastructure like roads. However, in general, limited governments are more likely to prioritize this as it is considered an essential service that benefits the society at large.

B. Protect citizens from attack: Both limited and unlimited governments have the responsibility to protect their citizens. However, limited governments are more likely to focus on protecting individual rights and freedoms, including protecting citizens from external attacks or threats.

C. Operate public schools: Providing public education is also a common responsibility of governments. While both limited and unlimited governments can operate public schools, limited governments usually aim to promote education as a means of empowering individuals and fostering a well-informed society.

D. Let citizens speak freely and protest: This option is where we can see a significant distinction. Limited governments generally value and uphold the right to free speech and peaceful protest as fundamental democratic principles. In contrast, unlimited governments often suppress dissent and limit the ability of citizens to freely express themselves.

Based on these considerations, option D, which suggests that citizens can speak freely and protest, is something that a limited government would be more likely to allow compared to an unlimited government.

tell us the the best 100%

I'll be glad to check your answer.