which of the following is a valid reason why scientist might reject a scientific theory?
a. some people disagree with it*****
b. it covers too broad a topic
c. new evidence contradicts it
d.it is too old
1. C
2. D
3. A
4. C
5. B
6. C
7. C
8. B
9. D
10. B
11. B
12. C
13. A
14. B
15. B
• I just took the test I got some wrong some right, but all of these are right.
I hope this is what y’all were looking for 🤷♀️👀.
I am going to check to see if your answers are correct.
Tasha is correct!!!! Thank you so much! It really helped. I appreciate it! XD
I am also Yay! SO, Tasha is correct!
This sight doesn't help me bc all I want is to get help on my semester exam and I cant find the page online as to not finding anything in the book either.... here goes my examss😥
tasha is still correct
The valid reason why scientists might reject a scientific theory is option C: new evidence contradicts it.
When scientists develop a theory, it is based on observations, experiments, and existing evidence. However, as new discoveries are made and additional evidence is accumulated, it is possible for that evidence to contradict or challenge the original theory. This can lead scientists to reevaluate the theory and, if the new evidence is compelling enough, reject it.
Scientists adhere to a principle known as falsifiability, which means that a scientific theory must be testable and potentially disprovable. This means that if new evidence emerges that undermines the core principles or predictions of a theory, scientists must critically analyze it and determine whether the theory can be modified or if it should be rejected in favor of a new explanation that is consistent with both the old and new evidence.
So, in summary, scientists might reject a scientific theory if new evidence contradicts it, as updating theories based on new information is an essential component of the scientific method.