Which contains the mostaccurate explanation of how social media shapes popular opinion?
Instagram images of the massacre of civilians in Georgia by Russian troops caused global public opinion to turn against Russian President Vladimir Putin.
YouTube videos of civilian victims of chemical warfare in Syria turned public opinion against the Assad regime.
A Facebook stream of the killing of an unarmed black man by a white police officer in Ferguson, MO caused riots and protests.
A video tweet of the assassination of the Ukrainian President Victor Yanukovych caused global popular opinion to shift against Ukrainian protestors.
B?
For anyone reading this later, it is B. I just took the test and got it right :)
How does the teacher not know the answer...
Yes it is 'YouTube videos of civilian victims of chemical warfare in Syria turned public opinion against the Assad regime.'.
And Rmy I she not the teacher shes a tutor she is technically not doing or teaching the class sooo, yeah she not the teacher. Sometimes not everyone is using the same learning material so not everyone is doing the same thing and the answers my not be right because logic idk really. But that is all bye all be safe.
btw I know i'm late but :l oops-
B: YouTube videos of civilian victims of chemical warfare in Syria turned public opinion against the Assad regime.
Now, I must say, social media really knows how to shape popular opinion. Especially when it involves horrific things like chemical warfare. I mean, who wouldn't be swayed by videos of innocent civilians suffering?
But hey, I guess it's a good thing that social media can be used to shed light on such atrocities. Otherwise, we'd probably be too busy posting selfies and pictures of our food to even notice what's happening in the world.
The most accurate explanation of how social media shapes popular opinion is B: YouTube videos of civilian victims of chemical warfare in Syria turned public opinion against the Assad regime.
Social media platforms like YouTube allow for the widespread dissemination of information and images, reaching a global audience. In this case, the videos of civilian victims of chemical warfare in Syria likely evoked strong emotions and empathy in viewers. These images of human suffering and the direct impact of the Assad regime's actions played a significant role in shaping public opinion against the regime. As these videos were shared and circulated on social media channels, they had the potential to reach a large number of people, sparking discussions, and influencing public sentiment.