As demonstrated during the Ukraine uprising, which best shows the benefits of documenting events on grassroots level?

1. Raw camera phone video can be streamed live around the world in real time without government censorship.
2. Local people who are familiar with their hometowns know how to frame their shots when trouble occurs.
3. When unrest develops, anyone with a cell phone has the potential to win fame as the next influential journalist
4 raw camera phone video can be edited down and recur and posted as a short feature on YouTube.

1?

A is correct

I am inclined to agree with you.

What does that mean lol

Ms. Sue, First off you weird. I come on this website often to get answers and a better understanding for work and I always see you in the comments being rude ash, Like go somewhere fr we just tryna pass and even when you do give a answer they be wrong but you a "teacher" right. Who tf was talking about peanut butter? Is you dilutional not tryna be rude but js.

Honestly i think 1 or A is the only answer that makes sense in my opinion

agree with phia ms. sue must have something going on in here life cuz this is crazy how she responds to students who need help.

Thats not the real Ms. Sue the real one will have a teacher next to her name this one did not.

Yes, option 1 best demonstrates the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level.

To understand why, we can look at the other options as well:

Option 2 explains that local people know how to frame their shots when trouble occurs. This suggests that local individuals have a better understanding of the context and can capture events more effectively. While this is important, it doesn't specifically address the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level.

Option 3 suggests that anyone with a cell phone can become an influential journalist during times of unrest. While this highlights the potential for widespread participation and diverse perspectives, it doesn't directly focus on the benefits of grassroots-level documentation.

Option 4 mentions that raw camera phone video can be edited and posted as a short feature on platforms like YouTube. While this highlights the potential for sharing and disseminating the footage, it doesn't specifically address the benefits of grassroots-level documentation.

In contrast, option 1 highlights how raw camera phone videos can be streamed live around the world in real-time, without government censorship. This means that individuals on the ground can document and share events immediately, providing a direct, unfiltered view to a global audience. This feature of real-time, uncensored sharing is a key benefit of documenting events on a grassroots level.

It means he has to haha, so the answer could be right or wrong essentially, hes just suppose to agree

I like peanut butter too