When might bias not interfere with credibility?
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/ajps/2003/00000047/00000004/art00003?crawler=true
Also bias is less likely to interfere with credibility, if the speaker admits the biases that s/he has.
I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.
Bias may not interfere with credibility in certain cases when it is explicitly disclosed and managed appropriately. Here's an explanation of when bias may not undermine credibility:
1. Opinions and editorials: Bias is expected and even necessary in opinion-based articles or editorials, where authors express their subjective views. As long as the bias is acknowledged upfront, it doesn't affect the piece's credibility because readers can make an informed judgment.
2. Personal experiences and testimonies: When individuals share their personal experiences or provide testimonials, bias may be present due to their subjective viewpoints. In such cases, bias doesn't necessarily diminish credibility since the focus is on individual perspectives rather than objective facts.
3. Advocacy and advocacy organizations: Organizations or individuals engaged in advocacy, campaigning, or lobbying for a specific cause or belief may have bias inherent in their work. Despite the bias, their credibility can be maintained if they operate transparently, disclose their agenda, and provide evidence-based arguments to support their claims.
4. Expert opinions and consultancy: Experts in various fields can provide valuable insights and opinions. While experts may have their own biases, their credibility can still be upheld as long as they follow ethical guidelines, disclose their affiliations, base their opinions on solid evidence, and are open to scrutiny and debate.
In all of these cases, transparency is essential to maintain credibility. Disclosing biases, stating intentions, and providing evidence-based arguments can help readers or audiences assess the information and make informed judgments for themselves.