So is the reason why scientists don’t like to use the word artificial because artificial receptors or anything else artificial does the same exact job as something natural so scientists belive it shouldn’t need a distinction?
Scientists generally do not avoid using the term "artificial" because artificial receptors or other artificial entities perform the same job as natural ones. The distinction between artificial and natural is mainly made to highlight the origin or composition of a particular entity.
In scientific terminology, the word "artificial" typically describes something that is man-made or created by human intervention. It is used to differentiate between naturally occurring phenomena or entities and those that have been synthesized or fabricated in a controlled laboratory setting.
When it comes to receptors, for example, scientists may use the term "artificial receptors" to refer to receptors that have been engineered or constructed in a laboratory rather than being naturally occurring in living organisms. This distinction is crucial to understanding the source and context of the receptors being discussed.
However, it is important to note that the word "artificial" does not imply that the functionality or effectiveness of the artificial entity is in any way inferior to its natural counterpart. It simply signifies a different origin or method of creation.
In summary, scientists use the term "artificial" to distinguish man-made or synthesized entities from those that occur naturally. It is not meant to imply that the artificial entities are any less capable or effective than natural ones.