1. Which of the following was the main contributor to finally bringing the United States out of the Great Depression?

A. National Recovery Administration
B. Wartime spending
C. Good Neighbor Policy
D. Election of Roosevelt

Is the answer C?

2. What inference can be drawn from the lack of US action in response to Japanese aggression against China in 1937?
A. Americans supported the Japanese over the Chinese
B. Americans did not believe Japan threatened them directly
C. The United States did not care about China
D. The United States depended on Japanese trade

D??

To answer the first question, "Which of the following was the main contributor to finally bringing the United States out of the Great Depression?" let's analyze the options.

A. National Recovery Administration: The National Recovery Administration was established in 1933 as part of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal. While it aimed to promote economic recovery, it did not singularly bring the United States out of the Great Depression.

B. Wartime spending: While increased spending during World War II did contribute to the recovery of the American economy, it alone was not the main contributor.

C. Good Neighbor Policy: The Good Neighbor Policy refers to the United States' approach to its relations with Latin American countries. While this policy aimed to improve diplomatic ties and increase cooperation between the United States and its southern neighbors, it was not a significant factor in ending the Great Depression.

D. Election of Roosevelt: The election of Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1932 marked a turning point in the United States' response to the Great Depression. Roosevelt implemented various programs under the New Deal to stimulate economic recovery and reinvigorate the country. The policies and initiatives undertaken by his administration played a crucial role in finally bringing the United States out of the Great Depression.

Therefore, the correct answer is D. The election of Roosevelt was the main contributor to finally bringing the United States out of the Great Depression.

Moving on to the second question, "What inference can be drawn from the lack of US action in response to Japanese aggression against China in 1937?" let's assess the options.

A. Americans supported the Japanese over the Chinese: This inference is unlikely since the lack of US action does not automatically imply support for one side or the other.

B. Americans did not believe Japan threatened them directly: This inference aligns with the historical context. In 1937, the United States had not yet entered World War II, and the Japanese aggression against China did not directly pose a threat to American soil.

C. The United States did not care about China: While the lack of action may give the impression that the United States did not prioritize China's situation, it cannot be inferred that the United States did not care about China altogether.

D. The United States depended on Japanese trade: This inference is accurate. At the time, the United States did depend on trade with Japan. Taking strong action against Japan's aggression could potentially jeopardize trade relations, which may have influenced the limited response.

Therefore, the correct answer is B. Americans did not believe Japan threatened them directly.

I disagree with both your answers. Be sure to go back into your text (always the best idea) and double-check. Read and re-read until you understand what each of these choices means.