i need help with this quesiton
How did the Nationalists regard Shay's Rebellion?
a. as proof that the states had too little power
b. as an example of how governments abuse their power
c. as proof that only a strong national government could prevent social disorder
d. as a demonstration of Americans' commitment to democracy
I think it might be A or B...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=01p&q=nationalists+shays+rebellion&btnG=Search
The correct answer is c. as proof that only a strong national government could prevent social disorder.
Shay's Rebellion was an armed uprising in Massachusetts from 1786 to 1787, led by Daniel Shays, a former Revolutionary War captain. The rebellion was primarily driven by economic grievances and aimed to prevent the foreclosure of farms by the state government.
The Nationalists, who were proponents of a strong central government, regarded Shay's Rebellion as proof that only a strong national government could prevent social disorder. They believed that the rebellion highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which had established a weak national government with limited powers. The Nationalists argued that a stronger federal government was needed to maintain order and protect the rights and property of citizens.
In summary, the Nationalists viewed Shay's Rebellion as evidence that a strong national government was necessary to prevent social unrest and maintain stability.
To answer this question, we need to understand the context of Shay's Rebellion and the perspectives of the Nationalists. Shay's Rebellion was an armed uprising that occurred in Massachusetts in the years 1786-1787. It was led by farmers who were facing economic hardships and debt after the American Revolutionary War.
The Nationalists were a group of political thinkers and leaders who believed in the need for a strong central or national government. They were concerned about the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which had established a weak central government and granted significant power to the individual states.
Considering these factors, let's analyze the answer choices:
a. as proof that the states had too little power: This answer choice aligns with the viewpoint of the Nationalists, who believed that the states had too much power under the Articles of Confederation. They saw Shay's Rebellion as evidence that the states were unable to effectively respond to internal conflicts and maintain social order.
b. as an example of how governments abuse their power: While government abuse of power could be a valid concern, it doesn't directly address the Nationalists' perspective. The key concern for the Nationalists was the inadequacy of the central government, rather than the abuse of power.
c. as proof that only a strong national government could prevent social disorder: This answer choice aligns closely with the viewpoint of the Nationalists. They believed that a strong national government was necessary to maintain social order and prevent future uprisings like Shay's Rebellion.
d. as a demonstration of Americans' commitment to democracy: While Americans' commitment to democracy is an important aspect, it doesn't specifically address the Nationalists' perspective on Shay's Rebellion.
Based on the above analysis, the most appropriate answer would be c. as proof that only a strong national government could prevent social disorder. This response aligns with the Nationalists' concerns and their push for a stronger central government.