Any ideas on:
Why does society perceive street (blue collar) crime has more impact in society?
Why does society perceive white collar crime have more impact in society than blue-collar crime.
Make an argument for each side and provide sociological theoretical support for both sides. Include examples of the media covers and reports both types of crimes, and societal response.
We do not do your homework for you. Although it might take more effort to do the work on your own, you will profit more from your effort. We will be happy to evaluate your work though.
However, I will start you out.
Street crime is usually perceived as more violent, while white collar crime usually involves much larger sums of money.
The perception of the impact of street (blue-collar) crime and white-collar crime in society can vary due to a variety of factors, including media coverage and societal responses. Let's explore both sides of the argument and provide sociological theoretical support for each perspective.
1. Perception of Street (Blue-Collar) Crime having more impact:
One argument is that society perceives street crime to have a greater impact because it often involves visible acts of violence and immediate harm to victims. This perspective suggests that the direct physical consequences associated with street crime make it more salient and immediate in people's minds. When incidents of street crime occur, they tend to receive significant media attention, amplifying the perception of its societal impact.
Sociological theoretical support:
Labeling Theory: According to this theory, society assigns labels to certain individuals or behaviors, labeling them as deviant. Street crime offenders are often stigmatized, labeled as criminals, and seen as a threat to public safety. The heightened social response to street crime can reinforce the perception that it has a significant impact on society.
Example of media coverage and societal response:
When a violent street crime occurs, such as a robbery or assault, news outlets tend to report it extensively, often emphasizing the severity of the incident and the potential harm it poses to the community. Additionally, communities often exhibit a strong response to street crime incidents, demanding increased police presence, stricter law enforcement, or stricter sentencing.
2. Perception of White-Collar Crime having more impact:
On the other hand, some argue that white-collar crime has a more significant societal impact than blue-collar crime. White-collar crime is typically committed by individuals in positions of power and influence, such as corporate executives or professionals. This perspective argues that the consequences of white-collar crimes, though often less visible, can be far-reaching and affect a larger number of individuals and communities.
Sociological theoretical support:
Conflict Theory: This theory suggests that societal power imbalances lead to social conflict. In the case of white-collar crime, those in positions of power may exploit their authority to engage in illegal activities, causing harm to numerous individuals and communities. The perception of white-collar crime having more impact aligns with the power dynamics outlined by the conflict theory.
Example of media coverage and societal response:
Instances of white-collar crime, such as corporate fraud or embezzlement, tend to receive significant media attention due to the potential economic and social ramifications they entail. The media often focuses on exposing corrupt practices and shedding light on the negative consequences for employees, shareholders, and the wider economy. In response, society may demand stronger regulations, corporate accountability, and legal consequences for white-collar offenders.
In summary, society's perception of the impact of street crime and white-collar crime can be influenced by various factors, including media coverage and societal responses. While street crime is often perceived as having a greater immediate impact due to its visible consequences, white-collar crime can be argued to have a more extensive and far-reaching impact on individuals and communities. Sociological theories like labeling theory and conflict theory offer support for both perspectives, highlighting the different dynamics at play in societal perceptions of these crimes.