7.The case of __________ helped to reinforce the doctrine of "national supremacy."
a.Plessy v. Ferguson
b.McCullough v. Maryland
c.Marbury v. Madison
d.Dred Scott v. Sandford
B?
Yes.
To determine the correct answer, let's break down each option and look at their significance in relation to the doctrine of "national supremacy":
a. Plessy v. Ferguson: This case, decided in 1896, established the "separate but equal" doctrine, which allowed for racial segregation. While it had an impact on civil rights and led to the segregation of public facilities, it did not directly reinforce the doctrine of "national supremacy."
b. McCullough v. Maryland: This case, decided in 1819, interpreted the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution and affirmed the authority of the federal government over the states. It reinforced the doctrine of "national supremacy" by establishing that the federal government has implied powers necessary for carrying out its enumerated powers.
c. Marbury v. Madison: This case, decided in 1803, established the principle of judicial review, giving the Supreme Court the power to declare laws enacted by Congress unconstitutional. While it had significant implications for constitutional interpretation, it did not directly reinforce the doctrine of "national supremacy."
d. Dred Scott v. Sandford: This case, decided in 1857, held that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered citizens and therefore could not bring lawsuits in federal courts. While it had a significant impact on the issue of slavery, it did not directly reinforce the doctrine of "national supremacy."
Based on this analysis, the correct answer would be b. McCullough v. Maryland as it directly addressed and reinforced the doctrine of "national supremacy."