Pros and cons of the great society???

why reed why

john wick we're in the same boat here reed ur not helping ;-;

The Great Society was a set of social welfare programs and policies introduced by President Lyndon B. Johnson in the 1960s. Like any major initiative, it had its own set of pros and cons. To analyze the pros and cons of the Great Society, we can look at its goals and outcomes.

Pros:
1. Poverty Reduction: One of the primary goals of the Great Society was to reduce poverty in the United States. Programs such as Medicaid, Medicare, Head Start, and food stamps provided assistance to low-income individuals and families, helping them meet their basic needs.
2. Social Security Expansion: The Great Society expanded social security benefits, providing financial assistance to senior citizens and disabled individuals. This helped improve the quality of life and ensured a safety net for vulnerable populations.
3. Civil Rights Advancement: The Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act were landmark legislations passed during the Great Society era. These laws aimed to end racial discrimination and enhance the rights and opportunities of African Americans and other minorities.
4. Education and Job Opportunities: The Great Society made significant investments in education through the establishment of the Department of Education and funding for programs like Head Start. These efforts aimed to improve educational opportunities and job prospects for disadvantaged communities.

Cons:
1. Financial Burden: The Great Society programs required a substantial amount of government spending. Critics argue this led to increased government debt and potentially higher taxes, creating a financial burden for future generations.
2. Dependency Concerns: Some critics argue that the Great Society programs fostered dependency on government assistance rather than empowering individuals to become self-sufficient. They believe that long-term reliance on welfare programs can discourage personal responsibility and hinder economic growth.
3. Inefficiency and Bureaucracy: Critics contend that the implementation of the Great Society programs was often inefficient and bureaucratic, resulting in wasteful spending and limited effectiveness. They argue that the programs' design and administration could have been more streamlined and responsive to local needs.
4. Unintended Consequences: Some argue that certain programs within the Great Society, such as public housing initiatives, inadvertently led to the concentration of poverty in certain communities, perpetuating cycles of disadvantage and limiting upward mobility.

To fully understand the pros and cons of the Great Society, it is important to consider different perspectives and assess the long-term impacts of these programs.

Read lots. It's still controversial, 50 years later, because some of the programs are still in existence.

https://www.google.com/search?q=pros+and+cons+of+the+great+society&ie=&oe=

yooo thanks Reed