Which of the following should you do to make your argument effective?

Answers:

Compare the opposite side's views to something unpleasant.

Include only general details the audience will understand.

Use specific details to refute the opposite side's views.

Appeal strongly to the emotions of your audience.

I think its C or D.

Thank you!

To determine the correct answer, let's examine each option:

A) Comparing the opposite side's views to something unpleasant might be helpful in some cases, but it is not a guaranteed way to make your argument effective.

B) Including only general details that the audience will understand could potentially simplify your argument, but it may also make it less persuasive and impactful.

C) Using specific details to refute the opposite side's views is generally considered an effective strategy. When you present specific evidence or examples to counter the opposing arguments, it strengthens your position and demonstrates a deeper understanding of the topic.

D) Appealing strongly to the emotions of your audience can indeed be effective, as emotions can play a significant role in persuading others. However, relying solely on emotions without providing substantial evidence or logical reasoning might weaken your argument.

Based on this analysis, option C seems to be the most suitable choice. By using specific details to refute the opposite side's views, you can strengthen the credibility and persuasiveness of your argument.

I think the key is make the argument "effective." C would accomplish that better than D.

Be sure to check your text.

You're welcome.