Which was a cultural accomplishment of the Tokugawa regime?
The novel form of literature was employed.
Kabuki Theater became popular in cities.
Its architecture reflected Chinese influence. (My choice)
Block printing was widely implemented.
Why did the U.S. role in Latin America increase during World War I?
War debts had weakened Latin America’s ability to trade beyond its hemisphere.
A majority of Latin American countries had sided with the Central Powers and lost.
Latin American coastal shipping was destroyed in the war’s massive sea battles.
Weakened economically by war, France and Britain no longer had funds to invest. (My choice)
you heard the man he said no ---->
To determine which was a cultural accomplishment of the Tokugawa regime, you can examine each option and see which one is true.
The novel form of literature was indeed employed during the Tokugawa regime. Many works of fiction and literature were written and published during this time, including fictional narratives, historical accounts, and plays.
Kabuki Theater also became popular in cities during the Tokugawa regime. Kabuki is a traditional form of Japanese theater, known for its elaborate costumes, stylized performances, and dramatic storytelling.
The statement "Its architecture reflected Chinese influence" is incorrect. The architecture during the Tokugawa regime, known as "Edo architecture," was a unique style that evolved within Japan and was influenced by indigenous traditions and customs, rather than Chinese influence.
Block printing was widely implemented during the Tokugawa regime. This printing technique allowed for the mass production of written materials, including books, manuscripts, and Buddhist scriptures.
Therefore, the correct answer to the first question is: Kabuki Theater became popular in cities.
Now, let's move on to the second question about the increase of the U.S. role in Latin America during World War I.
First, we can analyze each option:
1. War debts had weakened Latin America's ability to trade beyond its hemisphere. This could be a reason as war can often have economic consequences that affect global trade.
2. A majority of Latin American countries had sided with the Central Powers and lost. This option does not seem plausible as most Latin American countries remained neutral during World War I.
3. Latin American coastal shipping was destroyed in the war's massive sea battles. While there were significant sea battles during World War I, it is unlikely that Latin American coastal shipping would have been directly targeted by these battles in a significant manner.
4. Weakened economically by war, France and Britain no longer had funds to invest. This option seems more plausible as France and Britain were major investors in Latin America, and if their economies were weakened by the war, they might not have been able to invest as much in the region.
Based on the analysis, the most likely answer to the second question is: Weakened economically by war, France and Britain no longer had funds to invest.