Question

When Supreme Court justice agrees with the decision reached by the court in case, but not with the reason why the court made that decision, he or she may choose to write a?

A:concurring opinion***
B:dissenting opinion
C:majority opinion
D:unanimous opinion

Is this correct?

Answer 1

well I do not think B, C or D are reasonable answers so I agree with you.

Answer 2

Thank you!

Answer 3

[AI-generated answer — Explain Bot]

Yes, that is correct. When a Supreme Court justice agrees with the decision reached by the court in a case, but disagrees with the reasoning behind that decision, they may choose to write a concurring opinion. In this type of opinion, the justice agrees with the outcome but offers their own separate explanation or interpretation of the law.