John Quinn does not explain the rule about the paddle to Paul, the narrator of “The Pigman & Me.” How does this one action affect the rest of the essay?

Does this question want me to write a simple response or a whole big paragraph?

I suggest you answer it in a paragraph.

Based on the question, it seems like you are being asked to provide a more detailed response rather than a simple one-sentence answer. In order to effectively answer the question and explain the impact of John Quinn not explaining the rule about the paddle to Paul, it would be best to provide a thorough and coherent paragraph that analyzes the consequences of this action in relation to the rest of the essay.

Here is an example of a paragraph that addresses the question:

John Quinn's failure to explain the rule about the paddle to Paul, the narrator of “The Pigman & Me,” serves as a turning point in the essay, ultimately shaping the events that unfold. This action not only establishes a sense of secrecy between John and Paul but also sets the stage for conflict and betrayal. The absence of clear communication on John's part creates an atmosphere of uncertainty and tension, leaving Paul feeling left out and questioning their friendship. As a result, the narrative takes a darker turn, as Paul's distrust and frustration intensify. The impact of this action is significant, as it triggers a series of events that drive the essay's plot forward and ultimately lead to a deeper exploration of friendship and its complexities.

Remember, this is just an example paragraph, and you can modify it or expand upon it according to your specific analysis and understanding of the text.

It affects the rest of the story because now John wants to fight Paul but he didn't know he was supposed to give it to him.