Why did Machiavelli advocate the use of force by a ruler?
a. to establish and promote international trade routes that help to improve the economy
b. to provide for the common good of all citizens of the region
c. to lessen the chance of revolt within the ruler’s domain and ensure a prolonged reign
d. to gain power over the state through competent government
I think it is c because he was making the citizens scared
Yes, C.
thank you
You're welcome.
You are correct, Machiavelli advocated the use of force by a ruler primarily to lessen the chance of revolt within the ruler's domain and ensure a prolonged reign. However, let me explain how you can arrive at this answer by examining Machiavelli's views and teachings.
To understand Machiavelli's perspective, it is essential to consider his most significant work, "The Prince," in which he explores political philosophy and offers advice to rulers. Machiavelli believed that the primary goal of a ruler should be to maintain power and stability in their state.
Machiavelli recognized that the political landscape of his time was often ruthless and unpredictable. He observed that rulers who were seen as weak or lenient would be more susceptible to internal conflict, rebellion, and the loss of their power. This understanding influenced his advice to rulers, advocating the strategic use of force as necessary for maintaining control.
Machiavelli argued that displaying strength and decisiveness, even through the use of force, would discourage discontent among the population and prevent potential rivals from challenging the ruler's authority. He believed that fear of the ruler's power would create a sense of order and stability, potentially deterring revolts and ensuring a long reign.
Therefore, option c, "to lessen the chance of revolt within the ruler's domain and ensure a prolonged reign," aligns with Machiavelli's perspective and teachings.