In the 1910 Mexico presidential election, a writer and reformer named Francisco Madero challenged Porfirio Diaz for the office (1). When Diaz saw that Madero might win the election, he had the reformer arrested on false charges and declared himself the winner (2). Madero called for an armed uprising and his call was taken up by several local leaders: Hernán Cortés, Francisco Pizarro, and Hernando de Soto (3). The Mexican Revolution lasted nearly a decade, and although it began as an armed uprising against Diaz, it became a civil war rather than a revolt (4).
2,3,4 is true and 1 is false
your answer is correct, and the questions are the same, but the answers are not. malia is correct.
I just took the test and the correct answer was 1, 2, and 4 are correct but 3 is not. I hope this helps. :)
Ms. Sue they are not the same
To determine which statement is false, let's examine each statement individually:
Statement 1: In the 1910 Mexico presidential election, a writer and reformer named Francisco Madero challenged Porfirio Diaz for the office.
To verify the accuracy of this statement, you can conduct a search using reliable sources such as history books, encyclopedias, or credible websites. Look for information about the 1910 Mexico presidential election and whether Francisco Madero was a candidate who challenged Porfirio Diaz.
If multiple sources support the claim that Francisco Madero indeed ran for presidency and challenged Porfirio Diaz, then statement 1 is likely true. However, if you find conflicting information or no evidence of Madero's candidacy, then statement 1 is false.
Statement 2: When Diaz saw that Madero might win the election, he had the reformer arrested on false charges and declared himself the winner.
To verify this statement, you can again perform a search using reliable sources. Look for historical accounts or records that describe Porfirio Diaz's actions during the election and whether he arrested Madero on false charges.
If you find multiple sources that provide evidence of Diaz's arrest of Madero and his declaration of himself as the winner, then statement 2 is likely true. On the other hand, if you find no evidence or conflicting accounts, then statement 2 is false.
Statement 3: Madero called for an armed uprising, and his call was taken up by several local leaders: Hernán Cortés, Francisco Pizarro, and Hernando de Soto.
Again, conducting a search using reputable sources can help verify the accuracy of this statement. Look for information about Madero's call for an armed uprising and whether the mentioned figures, Hernán Cortés, Francisco Pizarro, and Hernando de Soto, joined his cause.
If you find evidence that supports Madero's call for an armed uprising and the involvement of these local leaders, then statement 3 is likely true. In case of conflicting information or lack of evidence, statement 3 might be false.
Statement 4: The Mexican Revolution lasted nearly a decade and became a civil war rather than a revolt.
To validate this statement, you can again refer to historical sources that discuss the Mexican Revolution. Look for information about the length of the revolution and how it evolved from an uprising against Diaz to a civil war.
If multiple sources agree that the Mexican Revolution lasted for a significant period and transformed into a civil war, then statement 4 is likely true. However, if you come across contradictory information or no evidence supporting this statement, then it is false.
By verifying each statement against reliable sources, you can determine which one is false. Remember to use reputable sources and cross-reference information to ensure accuracy.
Why did you repost this?
https://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1509567417
"n the 1910 Mexican election, a reformer named Francisco Madero challenged the reigning president, Porfirio Diaz, for office (1). When Diaz saw that Madero might win the election, he had the reformer arrested on false charges and declared himself the winner (2). After being released on bond, Madero called for an armed uprising and joined forces with several local leaders; Pascual Orozco, Francisco (Pancho) Villa, and Emiliano Zapata (3). Disagreements and infighting among the group resulted in a failed coup d’état, and Diaz remained president for another decade (4). "
1 and 2 are alike. But your answers are directly opposite.
Please do not post this question again.