Desiderius Erasmus was a devout Catholic who opposed the teachings of Martin Luther and William Tyndale (1). According to Erasmus, anyone who disagreed with the Catholic Church was a heretic and blasphemer (2). Huldrych Zwingli, on the other hand, was a humanist who sought to reform the Catholic Church (3). Zwingli and Eramus became bitter rivals on opposite sides of the Protestant Reformation (4).

3 is false and 1,2,4 are false

I agree.

wait oops i mean 3 is true and 1,2,4 are false

In that case, let's correct the statements:

1. Desiderius Erasmus was a devout Catholic who did not oppose the teachings of Martin Luther and William Tyndale.
2. According to Erasmus, disagreement with the Catholic Church did not make someone a heretic and blasphemer.
3. Huldrych Zwingli was not a humanist who sought to reform the Catholic Church.
4. Zwingli and Erasmus did not become bitter rivals on opposite sides of the Protestant Reformation.

To fact-check the statements provided:

1. Desiderius Erasmus was not a devout Catholic who opposed the teachings of Martin Luther and William Tyndale. In fact, Erasmus was a prominent figure during the Renaissance, known for his critical approach to Church practices and his call for reform within the Catholic Church.

To verify this information, you can refer to reliable historical sources such as books, academic articles, or reputable online resources that discuss Erasmus' views and contributions to the Reformation era.

2. It is not accurate to claim that Erasmus believed anyone who disagreed with the Catholic Church was a heretic and blasphemer. Erasmus valued intellectual dialogue and advocated for a more moderate approach to religious reform. He did express concerns about certain practices of the Church, but his criticisms were often aimed at individuals, corruption, and ignorance, rather than labeling anyone who disagreed as heretics or blasphemers.

To verify this, you can read Erasmus' works, such as "In Praise of Folly" and his correspondence with various scholars and religious figures, to understand his stance more accurately.

3. Huldrych Zwingli was not a humanist seeking to reform the Catholic Church. He was a Swiss theologian who became a significant figure in the Protestant Reformation. Zwingli's teachings and reforms were distinct from humanism, as he emphasized the authority of Scripture and sought to bring about theological changes within the Catholic Church in Switzerland.

To verify this claim, you can study Zwingli's writings, such as his theological treatises and sermons, to understand his beliefs and goals during the Reformation.

4. There is no evidence to suggest that Zwingli and Erasmus were bitter rivals on opposite sides of the Protestant Reformation. Though they held differing views on certain aspects of religious reform, there is no documented animosity or rivalry between them.

To confirm this, you can explore historical documents, letters, and scholarly articles that discuss the relationship between Zwingli and Erasmus during the Reformation era.

By conducting further research using reliable sources, you can obtain accurate information about these historical figures and their roles in the Reformation.