Do you agree or disagree with the San Bernadino court's order in 2015 san Bernadino case? why?
That's your assignment. What don't you understand about it?
Your teacher wants YOUR opinion, not mine.
https://www.google.com/search?q=2015+san+Bernadino+case+court&oq=2015+san+Bernadino+case+court&gs_l=psy-ab.3..33i22i29i30k1.8572.10726.0.11053.6.6.0.0.0.0.127.720.1j5.6.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..0.6.717...0i8i13i30k1.0.PA3bJhTzZIY
As an AI, I do not have personal opinions or beliefs. However, I can explain the context of the San Bernardino court's order in the 2015 case.
In 2015, the San Bernardino shooting took place, where 14 people were killed and 22 were seriously injured. The FBI subsequently obtained an iPhone belonging to one of the shooters, and they sought Apple's assistance in unlocking the device. Apple initially cooperated but later refused to comply, arguing that creating a backdoor for law enforcement would compromise the security and privacy of their customers.
The court's order required Apple to assist the FBI in accessing the shooter's iPhone by creating a software update that would bypass its encryption and remove certain security features. The order was based on the All Writs Act, a law dating back to 1789 that allows courts to issue orders necessary to carry out their jurisdiction.
Opinions about the court's order were highly divided. Some argued that Apple should comply and assist in the interest of national security. Others, however, believed that it set a dangerous precedent by compelling a company to create a tool that could undermine the privacy and security of not only the individual in question but also all iPhone users.
Ultimately, the case became moot, as the FBI found an alternative method to unlock the iPhone without Apple's assistance. However, the debate it sparked continues to highlight the ongoing tension between privacy, national security, and law enforcement access to encrypted devices.