Which most accurately describes how the Tang dynasty’s concepts of government influenced Asian civilizations?
india valued the tang dynastys social class organization and instituted a rigid caste system
vietnam respected the tang dynastys representative republic and instituted a direct democracy
korea admired the tang dynasty government and adopted a merit-based bureaucracy
japan revered the tang dynastys government and implemented communism
i think its c
Right again. :-)
thank you.
YW
The most accurate description would be that Korea admired the Tang dynasty government and adopted a merit-based bureaucracy.
To arrive at this answer, we need to determine which statement aligns with historical facts. Here is how you can analyze each option:
1. India valued the Tang dynasty's social class organization and instituted a rigid caste system: This statement is incorrect. The Tang dynasty's social class organization was not influential in the development of India's caste system. The caste system in India predates the Tang dynasty and has its own historical and cultural origins.
2. Vietnam respected the Tang dynasty's representative republic and instituted a direct democracy: This statement is also incorrect. The Tang dynasty did not have a representative republic form of government, and Vietnam did not adopt a direct democracy influenced by the Tang dynasty.
3. Korea admired the Tang dynasty government and adopted a merit-based bureaucracy: This statement is the most accurate. The Korean government of the time did indeed admire the Tang dynasty's government and borrowed elements, such as a merit-based bureaucracy, to reform its own administration.
4. Japan revered the Tang dynasty's government and implemented communism: This statement is incorrect. While Japan did have cultural and technological exchanges with the Tang dynasty, it did not adopt communism as a result.
By analyzing the options and considering historical accuracy, we can determine that Korea admired the Tang dynasty government and adopted a merit-based bureaucracy.