1. Some regular churchgoers believe that taxpayers' dollars should not be used to fund laboratories that carry out tests on animals for medical research. Hence, it is wrong to go on spending taxpayers' dollars for that purpose.
Answer: False Cause
2. Yogi Berra, an Italian American, was one of the greatest baseball players of all time. Other all-time greats of baseball include Joe DiMaggio, Mike Piazza, and Roy Campanella. So, no doubt about it, Italian Americans are great baseball players
Answer: Hasty Generalization
3. I think you're giving up on advanced calculus too easily. Calculus and simple arithmetic are both parts of math. Since you can do simple arithmetic, you can also do advanced calculus
Answer: False Cause
I agree 3 and 2. On 1,
<<some girls believe it is wrong to kiss boys, therefore it is wrong to allow kissing>> Does that help?
would this be a weak analogy
Explanation:
1. The argument presented in the first statement is a fallacy known as False Cause. The belief that taxpayers' dollars should not be used to fund laboratories that carry out tests on animals for medical research does not logically lead to the conclusion that it is wrong to continue spending taxpayers' dollars for that purpose. The connection between the two statements is weak, and there could be other factors to consider when determining whether or not it is appropriate to fund such laboratories.
To address the question and arrive at the correct answer, you should look for any logical fallacies or flaws in the argument and assess the validity of the conclusion based on those flaws.
2. The argument presented in the second statement is a fallacy called Hasty Generalization. It wrongly generalizes that because Yogi Berra, Joe DiMaggio, Mike Piazza, and Roy Campanella are all Italian Americans and are considered great baseball players, all Italian Americans are therefore great baseball players. This conclusion is not logically justified and relies on a limited sample size to make a broad generalization.
To determine the correct answer, it is important to identify any logical fallacies, unsupported assumptions, or flawed reasoning in the argument.
3. The argument presented in the third statement is a fallacy known as False Cause. The claim that because someone can do simple arithmetic, they can also do advanced calculus is not logically sound. While calculus is indeed a part of math, it is a complex and advanced subject that requires a deeper understanding and different skill set than simple arithmetic.
To arrive at the correct answer, it is crucial to identify any logical fallacies or flawed reasoning in the argument and assess whether the conclusion is logically justified based on the provided premises.