Which of the following is an advantage to SMRs?
(Select all that apply.)
use fusion instead of fission
reduce cost
less atmospheric emissions
reduce construction time
I think its a and c
Time to be honest. I'm too old to know what a SMR is!!!
since we are being honest I really don't care ...
To determine the advantages of SMRs (Small Modular Reactors), we need to analyze each option and assess whether it is an advantage of SMRs or not.
1. Use fusion instead of fission: This option is not relevant to the advantages of SMRs. SMRs typically use fission, not fusion, as a means of generating energy. Fusion is a different type of nuclear reaction that is not currently commercially viable for power generation.
2. Reduce cost: This is indeed an advantage of SMRs. Due to their smaller size and modular nature, SMRs can potentially have lower capital costs compared to larger traditional nuclear reactors. The reduced cost can make nuclear power more economically viable and attractive.
3. Less atmospheric emissions: This is another advantage of SMRs. Although SMRs still produce some radioactive waste, their improved design and operation can result in reduced emissions, including fewer greenhouse gases, compared to conventional fossil fuel power plants.
4. Reduce construction time: This is a known advantage of SMRs. Their smaller size and modular design allow for more streamlined and efficient manufacturing processes, potentially leading to shorter construction times. This advantage can contribute to faster deployment of nuclear power plants and quicker availability of energy generation.
Therefore, the correct options for advantages of SMRs are:
- Reduce cost
- Less atmospheric emissions
- Reduce construction time