Which of the following is an advantage to SMRs?
(Select all that apply.)
use fusion instead of fission
reduce cost
less atmospheric emissions
reduce construction time
To determine which of the options is an advantage to SMRs (Small Modular Reactors), let's analyze each option:
1. Use fusion instead of fission: This option is not applicable because SMRs use fission, not fusion. Fusion reactors are a different type of nuclear technology.
2. Reduce cost: SMRs have the potential to reduce cost compared to larger nuclear reactors. The smaller designs of SMRs allow for modular construction, which can result in reduced costs in manufacturing, transportation, and on-site assembly.
3. Less atmospheric emissions: SMRs generally produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions compared to fossil fuel power plants. Nuclear power is a low-carbon energy source, and SMRs contribute to reducing atmospheric emissions by generating electricity without the combustion of fossil fuels.
4. Reduce construction time: SMRs are designed to be constructed in factories and then transported to the installation site. The modular construction approach allows for concurrent manufacturing and site preparation, potentially reducing construction time compared to traditional larger-scale reactors.
Based on this analysis, the advantages to SMRs are reducing cost, less atmospheric emissions, and reducing construction time.
The advantages of SMRs (Small Modular Reactors) include:
1. Reduce cost: SMRs have the potential to reduce costs compared to traditional larger reactors. The modular design allows for easier manufacturing and assembly, potentially lowering the upfront capital costs.
2. Less atmospheric emissions: SMRs can reduce atmospheric emissions compared to other forms of energy generation, such as fossil fuels. SMRs produce very low or zero greenhouse gas emissions, helping to mitigate climate change and improve air quality.
3. Reduce construction time: SMRs have the advantage of shorter construction time compared to larger reactors. The modular design allows for parallel construction and shorter overall project timelines.
Therefore, the correct options are:
- Reduce cost
- Less atmospheric emissions
- Reduce construction time