Please help Me With These Questions
1.what is one difference between the scientific theory and scientific law
2. what are two similarities a scientific theory and scientific law
3. Sam noticed every time she rolled a ball on a flat surface it did not stop unless she applied a force on it. This happened multiple times. The outcome never changed. Would you classify this as a law or theory? Why?
4.4. A scientist discovered that Earth’s outer layer is made of plates. These plates can move. The movement of these plates explains why volcanoes and earthquakes occurs and formation of mountains. Should these observations be considered evidence for a theory or law? Why?
am i the only one who searched it up for the answers?
How would you like us to help you with these questions?
can you help me understand the scientific law and theory and help me to figure out the answers to the questions
What does your text say about scientific law and theory?
A scientific theory is more of an idea,And a scientific law is something that has already been proven in every circumstance available
A law predicts what happens while a theory proposes why.
For example your number 3:
We can predict that
Oh Okay
A law predicts what happens while a theory proposes why.
For example your number 3:
Our theory might be that you need a force to change momentum.
However with Newton's second law we can predict that the momentum will change at a rate proportional to the force applied.
Oh Okay I get it
Sure, I can help you with these questions. Let's go through them one by one:
1. The main difference between a scientific theory and a scientific law is that a theory explains why something happens, whereas a law describes what happens. A scientific theory provides a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on empirical evidence, observations, and experimentation. It is generally more complex and involves multiple hypotheses and predictions. On the other hand, a scientific law is a statement that describes a recurring pattern in nature without providing an explanation for why it occurs.
2. There are a few similarities between a scientific theory and a scientific law. First, both are based on empirical evidence and scientific research. They are both formed through observation, experimentation, and data analysis. Second, both theories and laws are subject to revision or modification based on new evidence. Scientific knowledge evolves over time, and as new information becomes available, both theories and laws may be refined or revised.
3. In this scenario, Sam's observation that every time she rolled a ball on a flat surface it did not stop unless she applied a force on it suggests a recurring and universal pattern. However, since this observation is based on personal experiences and not on extensive scientific testing or research, it would not be classified as either a scientific law or theory. It would be more appropriate to call it an observation or a hypothesis.
4. The scientist's discovery that Earth's outer layer is made of plates that can move and the subsequent explanation of how this movement leads to volcanoes, earthquakes, and mountain formation would be considered evidence for a scientific theory. This is because the observation is based on scientific research and knowledge accumulated from various disciplines such as geology, plate tectonics, and seismology. The theory of plate tectonics provides a comprehensive explanation of these phenomena and is supported by multiple lines of evidence, including geological, geophysical, and paleontological data.
To summarize, a scientific theory and a scientific law have some differences and similarities. Sam's observation would be considered a hypothesis rather than a law or theory, while the scientist's observations about plate tectonics provide evidence for a scientific theory.