Is the value of the second 5in 450,852,137 one-tenth the value of the first 5? Explain
no
try thinking
5555
the 5 on the right is 5
the next one left is 50
the next one is 500
the next one is 5,000 a thousand times the one three places to he right
Can you explain better because the way I'm looking at it the answer is yes. I'm I correct
To determine if the value of the second 5 in 450,852,137 is one-tenth the value of the first 5, we need to compare their place values.
In the number 450,852,137, the first 5 is in the ten millions place (50,000,000) and the second 5 is in the hundreds place (500).
To check if the value of the second 5 is one-tenth the value of the first 5, we need to divide the value of the first 5 by 10:
50,000,000 ÷ 10 = 5,000,000
Comparing the value of 5,000,000 (the value of the first 5 divided by 10) to 500 (the value of the second 5), we can see that 5,000,000 is indeed ten times greater than 500. Therefore, the value of the second 5 in 450,852,137 is NOT one-tenth the value of the first 5.
To determine if the value of the second 5 is one-tenth the value of the first 5, we need to compare the two values. In this case, the first 5 is not provided, so we cannot directly calculate its value. However, we can still explain the process to determine if the value of the second 5 is one-tenth of the first 5.
If we assume that the value of the first 5 is equal to "x," then we can set up an equation to represent the relationship between the two 5s.
According to the given information, the value of the second 5 is 450,852,137. We can express this as:
450,852,137 = (1/10) * x
To solve this equation, we can multiply both sides by 10 to eliminate the fraction:
10 * 450,852,137 = x
4,508,521,370 = x
So, if the value of the first 5 is equal to or greater than 4,508,521,370, then the value of the second 5 is one-tenth the value of the first 5.
However, without knowing the value of the first 5, we cannot mathematically prove if the value of the second 5 is indeed one-tenth the value of the first 5.