How did food surpluses change the way of life in early human settlements?
A-villages needed to organize governments
B-the population decreased
C-more hunting and gathering was required
D-humans needed fewer tools and possesions
my best answer is A is that correct
Its A
Could be. Read through the quizlet links here to be sure.
https://www.google.com/search?q=How+did+food+surpluses+change+the+way+of+life+in+early+human+settlements&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS705US707&oq=How+did+food+surpluses+change+the+way+of+life+in+early+human+settlements&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i61j69i64.1568j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
is C better
No.
Really none of those answers is very good.
Surpluses in anything (food, tools, pots, baskets, whatever) meant that people had things to trade with others.
The question is in here:
https://quizlet.com/358338/social-studies-chapter-1-flash-cards/
The answer is in here:
https://quizlet.com/54445512/social-studies-chapter-2-flash-cards/
Are you sure those four answer choices go with this particular question??
More government. More food led to larger villages (away from farming), and larger villages cause a need for government (regulations, markets, police, etc).
It is all
Yes, your answer A is correct. Food surpluses indeed had a significant impact on early human settlements by necessitating the organization of governments and leading to changes in their way of life.
Explanation:
To understand why A is the correct answer, let's break down the options:
A) Villages needed to organize governments: This option highlights how food surpluses affected societal organization. When early human settlements were able to produce more food than they needed to subsist, it created a surplus. This surplus led to the growth of villages or settlements into larger communities. With an increase in population and the need to manage and distribute resources, villages had to develop systems of governance and administration. This included establishing leaders or councils to oversee the distribution of the surplus food and make decisions for the community.
B) The population decreased: This option is contradicted by historical evidence. Food surpluses generally led to population growth rather than a decrease. When communities had enough food to sustain themselves and could also store surplus food for times of scarcity, it allowed for population growth as people had the means to reproduce and support larger families.
C) More hunting and gathering was required: This option is not supported by the concept of food surpluses. Food surpluses imply that the community is producing more food than is immediately necessary for survival. Therefore, there would be no need for increased hunting and gathering, as the surplus provides a buffer against shortages.
D) Humans needed fewer tools and possessions: This option is also not aligned with the concept of food surpluses. In fact, with food surpluses, settlements would have access to more resources, including food, which would lead to an increased need for tools and possessions to manage and store the surplus.
So, the correct answer, as you identified, is A. Food surpluses had a transformative effect on early human settlements by necessitating the organization of governments to manage and distribute resources, ultimately changing their way of life.