1. He must have missed the class yesterday.
2. He must have cut the class yesterday.
----------------------------------------
What is the difference between two sentences?
Is 'cut' a worse word than 'missed'?
"He must have cut class yesterday" says that he skipped his class on purpose, and did not intend to go to class.
"He must have missed the class yesterday" could also mean that he wanted to attend class but couldn't; for example if he could not reach class on time because of traffic or bad weather.
The difference between the two sentences lies in the choice of words used to describe someone's absence from class. In the first sentence, "He must have missed the class yesterday," the word "missed" indicates that the person was not present in class, but it does not necessarily imply any intentional or negative reason for their absence. It simply suggests that the person was not there.
On the other hand, in the second sentence, "He must have cut the class yesterday," the word "cut" implies a deliberate or intentional avoidance of attending class. It suggests that the person intentionally chose not to go to class, possibly without a valid reason or permission.
In terms of the words "missed" and "cut" themselves, it can be said that "cut" carries a more negative connotation compared to "missed." "Cut" implies a deliberate action of avoiding or skipping class, which is generally considered to be against the expected behavior of a student. Meanwhile, "missed" simply indicates that the person was not present for some reason without suggesting a deliberate action.
However, it's important to note that the perception of whether one word is worse or more negative than the other can vary among individuals and can be influenced by cultural context or personal beliefs.