Why are there usually fewer civic responsibilities in a country with an unlimited government?

a) Citizens are excluded from the operation of government.
b) Governments place lesser burdens on citizens to keep power.
c) The lack of rights keeps citizens from understanding politics.
d) The absence of a constitution means there are no formal definitions of responsibilities.

I think that it's C. Am I correct?

No, the correct answer is b) Governments place lesser burdens on citizens to keep power. In a country with an unlimited government, the governing authority typically holds significant power and control. This often results in fewer civic responsibilities for citizens, as the government itself assumes a larger role in decision-making and implementation of policies. The government may intentionally limit the involvement and participation of citizens in order to maintain and consolidate its power.

To determine the correct answer, let's break down each option and analyze them.

a) Citizens are excluded from the operation of government: In a country with an unlimited government, the government typically has complete control over decision-making, policies, and operations. This often leads to citizens being excluded or marginalized in the political process, but it does not necessarily directly decrease civic responsibilities.

b) Governments place lesser burdens on citizens to keep power: In a country with an unlimited government, the government tends to concentrate power and authority in the hands of a few individuals or a single entity. As a result, these governments may be less inclined to impose significant burdens or responsibilities on their citizens, particularly if it poses a threat to their hold on power. This option suggests a possible reason for fewer civic responsibilities in such a system.

c) The lack of rights keeps citizens from understanding politics: While it is true that a lack of rights or restrictions can limit citizens' political awareness or engagement, it does not directly explain why there would be fewer civic responsibilities. Limited rights can inhibit citizens' ability to participate fully in civic responsibilities, but it does not inherently imply a decrease in those responsibilities.

d) The absence of a constitution means there are no formal definitions of responsibilities: Constitutions often play a crucial role in defining citizens' rights and responsibilities, as well as outlining the limits of government power. In a country with an unlimited government, the absence of a constitution can contribute to an environment where there are no formal definitions or guidelines regarding civic responsibilities. This option suggests another possible reason for fewer civic responsibilities.

Looking at the options, b) "Governments place lesser burdens on citizens to keep power" aligns most closely with the question, as it directly addresses the idea of limited civic responsibilities in a country with an unlimited government. Therefore, the correct answer is b).

No.

http://www.quora.com/What-is-the-definition-of-unlimited-government