Good morning. I am having doubts of the answers I have selected the two questions below. Can someone help me?
In evaluating the source of information there are __________ questions or criterion one must ask or consider.
1. 3
2. 4
3. 5
4. 6
I selected number 4. 6 but am looking at 2.
1. A researcher may conclude the inquire before all the variables affecting the observed outcomes are identified or fully understood is referred to as:
1. error of selective observation
2. error of overgeneralization
3. made up information
4. ego involvement
I selected 1. But cannot find data to confirm my decision. I was looking at 3 but was not sure.
1. That number varies from one expert to another. Go with your text's interpretation.
2. No.
http://quizlet.com/9983670/research-design-analysis-flash-cards/
Good morning! I'd be happy to help you with your questions.
For the first question about evaluating the source of information, there are a few criteria you can consider. These criteria can help you determine if a source is reliable and credible. Here are some common questions or criteria to ask:
1. Authority: Does the source come from a reputable and knowledgeable individual or organization?
2. Objectivity: Is the source unbiased and free from personal or political agendas?
3. Accuracy: Is the information supported by evidence or reliable data?
4. Currency: Is the source up-to-date and relevant to the topic?
5. Relevance: Does the source directly address your research or information needs?
Based on these criteria, which number do you think is the correct answer?
Regarding the second question, it asks about the term used to describe a researcher concluding the inquiry before identifying all the variables affecting the observed outcomes. Let's explore the options:
1. Error of selective observation: This refers to the tendency to focus only on evidence that supports our existing beliefs while disregarding contradictory evidence. It may not directly relate to concluding an inquiry prematurely.
2. Error of overgeneralization: This refers to drawing broad conclusions from limited or insufficient evidence. While it could be related, it might not specifically describe concluding an inquiry prematurely.
3. Made up information: This option seems unrelated to the term requested in the question.
4. Ego involvement: This refers to personal bias influencing the researcher's objectivity, but it does not directly address concluding an inquiry prematurely.
Considering the options and their definitions, which number do you think is the most appropriate answer?
Let me know your thoughts, and I can assist you further in clarifying your doubts.