In Grutter v. Bollinger (2003), the Supreme Court ruled in favor of:

A. the equal-protection clause.
B. the use of race as a diversity factor in law school admissions criteria procedures.
C. all forms of affirmative action.
D. the exclusionary rule.
A?

No. Not A.

Correct! The Supreme Court ruled in favor of B. the use of race as a diversity factor in law school admissions criteria procedures. To find the answer to this question, you could have researched the Grutter v. Bollinger case and the ruling in the Supreme Court. This case involved the University of Michigan Law School's affirmative action policy, and the Supreme Court held that it was constitutional to consider race as a factor in admissions decisions to promote diversity.