civil Disobedience
Part 2:
Thoreau’s ideas had a profound effect on a man named Gandhi. Gandhi, was a leader in India who worked to end British rule. He led India to independence and inspired many to non-violent forms of protest and resistance. He fought to end poverty, worked to expand women's right to vote, and built bridges between ethnic and religious groups. Like Thoreau, he lived simply, owned very little, and ate a vegetarian diet. In India, Gandhi's form of protest was called the "non-cooperation movement." He urged Indians to boycott British education systems and leave government jobs. The movement was very popular, and in part to stop its spread, the British controlled government arrested him. After a few years, he was released and became active in politics again. He inspired many to follow him on marches to protest various taxes. On one such march, thousands followed him 240 miles over 24 days to the sea to protest a salt tax. This march set the example of non-violent resistance to the government that others in the country followed. Eventually India won independence from Britain, in large part because of Gandhi work.
Gandhi's model of resistance and reform was creative, appealing, and successful. As a result, Dr. Martin Luther King looked to Gandhi when the time came to find a way to resist segregation in the South. The lunch counter protests, famous for the passive response to anger, and even violence, aimed to end the separation enforced by laws in some regions of the South. King also organized walks, marches, and bus rides that were meant to bring attention to the issues facing African Americans. These forms of protest were directly modeled on Gandhi's, but King took them straight to the source of oppression. Where Gandhi's protests created awareness and built momentum, King's protests were in the face of great hatred and fear. The passive, non-violent protests were ultimately effective, mainly because the passive response to violence cast the opposition as brutes. However, change came slowly and at the cost of many lives. King remained committed to peaceful protest, however, until his death. King learned from Gandhi, expanding on what worked, applying old techniques to a new problem. Gandhi owed his philosophy, in part, to a New England poet who loved the woods.
How did Gandhi and King further Thoreau's idea of civil disobedience?
They did not ask others to join their cause just as Thoreau did.
They gave their followers a better model for disobedience than Thoreau.
They had less to lose than Thoreau and those who opposed slavery.
They recruited and encouraged others to disobey in an organized effort.***
Im thinking D but maybe it could be B? Please help
D is correct.
nkjkjk
Thank you
You're welcome.
Both options D and B are correct to some extent, but option D is the more accurate choice.
Gandhi and King furthered Thoreau's idea of civil disobedience by recruiting and encouraging others to disobey in an organized effort. Both leaders actively sought to mobilize people and create a collective movement against injustice. Gandhi urged Indians to boycott British education systems and leave government jobs as part of the non-cooperation movement, while King organized walks, marches, and bus rides to raise awareness of the issues facing African Americans and to challenge segregation.
Although option B states that Gandhi and King provided a better model for disobedience than Thoreau, it is important to note that both Gandhi and King drew inspiration from Thoreau's ideas on civil disobedience. Thoreau was a foundational influence for both leaders, and they built upon his principles to develop their own methods of resistance.
Overall, option D is the more comprehensive answer as it encompasses the active involvement of Gandhi and King in recruiting and organizing others to engage in acts of civil disobedience.