Internation Business

Debating the ethics of doing business in countries with totalitarian governments.

Debating the ethics of doing business in countries with totalitarian governments.

Obviously, most citizens of the United States would agree that totalitarian governments are something of the past, an antiquated way of dealing with a population that should no longer exist.

That being said...

I believe it is beneficial to the destruction of what remains of totalitarian governments and to the people of such unfortunate conditions to do international business in these countries. Globalization is something that exposes the entire world to the entire world, and as totalitarian governments attempt to suppress and keep in the dark their populations, globalization is the force that brings the light of destruction to such closed-minded government systems, and the light of the world to the population within.

I believe it is entirely ethical to do business in countries with totalitarian governments. Doing business in these countries exposes the people of these countries to the ideas of freedom and liberty, different and better ways of life, other cultural ideas, and the truth about what is going on in the world around them, despite their government's archaic and barbaric attempts to make these people believe only what they want them to believe; see only what they want them to see.

If a totalitarian government resists globalization, or tries to limit it, it also resists and limits the economical benefits that come with globalization and international business, and therefore, for each unit of resistance given, subjects itself to a unit of economic hardship. Therefore international business is almost (if not just as effective) in some respects as outright war itself on these dictatorial governments and their suppression of their people. Doing business in countries with totalitarian governments benefits the people of these countries by exposure to the world.

It can be argued that doing business in such countries may subject these people to unsafe working conditions or allow exports into our own country that are unsafe or of poor quality. This is something the business itself must remain vigilant of. As long as no substandard labor is allowed, and no dangerous products allowed for import to our country, I believe doing business in countries with such governments is more than perfectly fine.

Is the the totalitarian government, or the nature of how citizens are treated that is the problem with our ethics? Is it possible for a totalitarian government to treat it citizens with respect, basic human rights, and with fundamental civil rights: rights of property, justice, equality, and liberty? Remember, South Africa was a case of a democratic government (whites voted) which caused a major ethical conflict for many businesses: Only when economic sanctions applied by international corporations were applied (ie no trade) did the country change (for the better).
I would suggest it is not the totalitarism that is the problem with ethics, but the conditions of its citizens that cause ethical conflict.

Interesting piece. Where did you get it?

This is mine... it has been plagarized.

  1. 👍
  2. 👎
  3. 👁
  1. swxto btdych wdlhcqj pflr yhvgzfj locqbjhep tgjq

    1. 👍
    2. 👎

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Response

Similar Questions

  1. math

    1. You are debating about whether to buy a new computer for $800.00 or a refurbished computer with the same equipment for $640.00. If a savings account earns 4.5% APR interest, how much do you really save with a refurbished

  2. Business

    Choose one of the newly industrializing countries mentioned in the text (p. 102 International Business).The countries are Western Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Israel, and the United States. The term developing is

  3. Ethics

    Which of the following frameworks encourages us to imagine alternative solutions to moral dilemmas, "focusing less on deciding between given alternatives" and,instead, "envisioning new alternatives" that we may not have initally

  4. World History

    Explain how totalitarian rulers were able to acquire power during the 1930s. Describe at least two specific totalitarian leaders, the conditions in their countries that played a part in their rise to power, and the way they used

  1. Gen 200

    Prepare a 700 to 1,050-word paper in which you explain the relationship among professional values, ethics, and career success. Address the following items in your explanation: Define values and ethics. Identify at least three

  2. ethics

    explain the ethics of public service. why must all criminal justice professionals adhere to such a set of ethics.

  3. Ethisc/Criminal Justice

    Which of the following frameworks would be most likely to justify convicting an innocent person? A. Virtue ethics B. Utilitarianism C. Kantain ethics D. Natural law I think it's A, but not 100% sure.

  4. Ethics in Criminal Justice

    Which of the following frameworks would be most likely to justify convicting an innocent person? A. Virtue ethics B. Utilitarianism C. Kantain ethics D. Natural law I think it's A, but not 100% sure.

  1. Social studies

    22. Which describes the relationship among national governments? A. All national governments are legally equal B. All national governments engage in alliances with other national governments C. National governments of larger

  2. human services

    What does the code of ethics tell about the relationship between ethics and the law? (Broken Link Removed) Read it. It is not long. It references the law.

  3. ethics in management

    I am trying to answer some question for class I am needing to find and understand these theories can someone please explain them or help me find information on them I cannot find anything that I understand searching for these

  4. gen

    What is the relationship between ethics and critical thinking? Why are ethics a concern in the academic environment? I have no clue so any will do

You can view more similar questions or ask a new question.