The purpose of peer review is to give both students an opportunity to gain insight in writing style and syntax without formal instruction. Sometimes it is beneficial to read an essay written on the same topic from a different perspective. It also can help to see how other people express similar ideas.
As you edit your classmate's paper, you are giving suggestions within the other student's learning level and when you receive your paper back, you get feedback as to how readable your paper is and error that stand out.
For the reluctant peer reviewer I'd encourage you to gleen from every paper you read. You will find different perspectives, vocabulary, and organizational tools that you can use in future papers. Everything you read becomes a part of you. What you do with it is up to you. Enjoy the process.
adfadfadsfasdfasdf f adf df sd asdfdsf sad sad fsdf sdf asdfasdfas as f
To see what sytle of writing you're doing . And is the messager is stated clear for the reader. This give them a chance make in the paper that is need it. They have the rights rather or do they want to publish it.
how would you encourage a reluctant peer reviewer?
how did using a formal writing process (planning, drafting, developing, revising, editing, and proofreading)help you creat more effective academic paper? This question sounds as if your teaching is asking YOU about how the writing
during a group meeting when they are each reading a draft of their formal report, Madiha and Anne realize that sometimes they have the word "there" correctly and sometimes the word should be "their". They use their word
Which of the following elements is a characteristic of a collaborative relationship? The collaborative relationship can have as few as one individual or as many as ten individuals involved in it. Physical proximity is a necessary
Of the following, which is the most important to consider when analyzing and revising an academic paper? A. That the paper will be entertaining for the instructor to read B. That the thesis is clear and that the main points
what are some advantages for both the reviewer and writer of peer reviews The author of a work that is reviewed by his/her peers gains prestige and legitimacy by having knowledgable people comment and review his work. The peers
need to write a paper arguing something with a specific purpose, and the paper needs to be directly toward someone I know. I was thinking of writing it to my friend about video games, but I'm having trouble thinking about an