Which example best shows the United States as a mediator?
A. Debating human rights with China****
B. Supporting democracy in the Philippines
C. Promoting a peace agreement in Bosnia
D. Encouraging the end of apartheid in Africa
No. Mediators don't debate.
Please look up mediator to be sure you know what a mediator does.
Sorry, my answer was an unfair assumption of the definition, upon further research it seems B would be the answer?
It’s D
D
To determine which example best shows the United States as a mediator, let's examine each option:
A. Debating human rights with China: While the United States may engage in discussions about human rights with China, this does not necessarily portray the U.S. as a mediator. It could be seen as a diplomatic effort, but not specifically mediation.
B. Supporting democracy in the Philippines: Supporting democracy in the Philippines could be considered an example of the United States promoting its values, but it does not necessarily involve mediation between conflicting parties.
C. Promoting a peace agreement in Bosnia: This example involves the United States actively working to promote a peace agreement in Bosnia. Mediation generally involves facilitating negotiations and bringing opposing parties together to reach a compromise or agreement. Thus, this option could be considered an example of the United States as a mediator.
D. Encouraging the end of apartheid in Africa: While the United States played a role in encouraging the end of apartheid in South Africa, it does not necessarily fit the definition of mediation. Mediation typically involves resolving conflicts between two or more opposing parties, whereas ending apartheid was more related to combating systemic oppression.
Based on this analysis, the option that best shows the United States as a mediator is C. Promoting a peace agreement in Bosnia.