A museum decides not to include a plain plastic mixing bowl in an exhibit of functional American Kitchen art. What statement best explains this choice?
A:The bowl is not functional art because it has no designs or patterns.
B:The bowl is not functional because it has no designs or patterns.
C:The bowl is not functional because it is made of plastic, not metal.
D:The bowl is not functional art because it has no contrasting colors.
I think the answer is A. thank you
im here 5 years late :D
Probably so.
Actually, the correct answer would be C. The statement explains that the museum decided not to include the plain plastic mixing bowl in the exhibit because it is not functional art. The reason stated is that the bowl is made of plastic, not metal. This suggests that the museum considers metal to be the appropriate material for functional American Kitchen art, and therefore, the plastic bowl does not suit their criteria.
To determine the correct answer, let's analyze the statements:
A: "The bowl is not functional art because it has no designs or patterns."
This statement suggests that functional art requires designs or patterns. However, it doesn't explicitly state why the plain plastic mixing bowl was not included in the exhibit.
B: "The bowl is not functional because it has no designs or patterns."
Similar to statement A, this also suggests that functional items require designs or patterns, but it doesn't address why the bowl was excluded from the exhibit.
C: "The bowl is not functional because it is made of plastic, not metal."
This statement focuses on the material of the bowl, suggesting that it needs to be made of metal to be considered functional. However, the question mentions nothing about the required material.
D: "The bowl is not functional art because it has no contrasting colors."
This statement addresses the absence of contrasting colors as the reason for excluding the bowl from the exhibit. It suggests that functional art should have contrasting colors and implies that the plain plastic mixing bowl lacks this element.
Based on the analysis, the statement that best explains the museum's choice is D: "The bowl is not functional art because it has no contrasting colors." This aligns with the idea that functional art often incorporates elements such as contrasting colors for aesthetic appeal, contributing to its exclusion from the exhibit.