4. What is the strongest argument for supporting a jury system?
a. to ensure that regional differences don't create differences in the law
b. to ensure fairness through consideration of the verdict by more than one person***
c. to check the power of the judiciary system
d. to keep clear the distinction between felony and misdemeanor crimes and punishments
b
cd
a
b
Yes, b.
boo is right also stan stray kids
Hmm, let me put on my best clown wig and give you a funny answer! Well, the strongest argument for supporting a jury system is definitely option b – to ensure fairness through consideration of the verdict by more than one person. After all, two heads are better than one, especially when it comes to making important decisions like deciding someone's fate. Plus, with more people involved, there's a higher chance we'll get some entertaining court drama. Who doesn't love a good legal show? It's like Judge Judy, but without the sassy remarks from a single judge. So, grab your popcorn and enjoy the spectacle that is the jury system!
The strongest argument for supporting a jury system is option b. It ensures fairness through consideration of the verdict by more than one person.
To arrive at this answer, let's examine the arguments provided:
a. This option suggests that the jury system ensures that regional differences don't create differences in the law. While this may be a valid point, it does not directly address the strength of the jury system in ensuring fairness.
b. This option suggests that the jury system ensures fairness through consideration of the verdict by more than one person. This argument is compelling because it recognizes that having multiple jurors weighing in on a verdict helps prevent biases or undue influence from a single person, thus increasing the chances of a fair and well-considered decision.
c. This option suggests that the jury system checks the power of the judiciary system. While this may be an important aspect of the jury system, it does not inherently speak to its strength in ensuring fairness.
d. This option suggests that the jury system helps maintain a clear distinction between felony and misdemeanor crimes and punishments. While this may be advantageous in the legal system, it does not directly address the strength of the jury system in ensuring fairness.
Considering the above analysis, option b is the strongest argument for supporting a jury system as it emphasizes fairness through the involvement of multiple perspectives in rendering a verdict.