Which of the following could be the best resource if you were writing a research report on giant pandas of China?

A. A university's website about giant pandas.
B. An encyclopedia entry about animals of East Asia (Definitely not this one)
C. An online article about endangered animals.
D. A map of china.
I think its a or C, but i'm gonna go with A since it primarily targets pandas.

The answers to the pretest in connexus are.

1. B
2. D
3. D
4. B
5. B
6. A
7. C
8. D
9. B
10. D
11. A
100% correct trust me I just took the pretest.

"Likewhat?!" is correct i got a 100%

thank you sooooooooo much Likewhat?! i got an 11/11 100%

Also, aren't pandas no longer endangered?

Oh awesome, thank you Ms.Sue! :)

Thanks guys! 100% from your website again :) You guys rock! :D

Warrior Cat Lover

tysm! I got two answers wrong but luckily u guys helped me out thx and yaay panda's are alive! e already lost the dinosaurs I'm not loosing panda's too! T^T

Based on the options provided, you are correct that options A or C could be the best resources for writing a research report on giant pandas of China. Now, let me explain how to arrive at this conclusion.

When conducting research, it's important to consider the reliability, relevance, and authority of your sources. Let's evaluate each option based on these criteria:

A. A university's website about giant pandas:
- Reliability: University websites are generally reliable sources of information as they are typically backed by academic expertise and rigorous research.
- Relevance: This option specifically focuses on giant pandas, which aligns with your research topic.
- Authority: Universities are considered authoritative sources due to their expertise and academic standing.

C. An online article about endangered animals:
- Reliability: The reliability of online articles can vary, so it's important to evaluate the credibility and reputation of the website or author before considering it as a reliable source.
- Relevance: While the article covers endangered animals in general, it would still provide valuable information about giant pandas being an endangered species.
- Authority: Assessing the authority of the article would depend on the reputation and expertise of the website or author.

B. An encyclopedia entry about animals of East Asia:
- Reliability: Encyclopedias are generally reliable sources; however, the fact that this entry covers a wide range of animals in East Asia may not provide in-depth information specifically about giant pandas.
- Relevance: As the entry covers animals of East Asia in general, it may lack depth and specificity required for your research on giant pandas of China.
- Authority: Encyclopedia entries are typically written by experts; however, this option may not have the level of authority compared to other sources that focus specifically on giant pandas.

D. A map of China:
- Reliability: Maps are useful resources for visual information, but in the case of a research report on giant pandas, it may not provide the necessary information and analysis required.
- Relevance: While understanding the geographical location of China is important, it doesn't directly contribute to the research on giant pandas.
- Authority: Maps do not provide authoritative information in the same way that academic sources do.

Considering the above evaluation, options A and C stand out as potential resources for your research report. Both options have their strengths, but option A, the university's website about giant pandas, is more likely to provide in-depth and reliable information specifically targeting pandas.

Therefore, choosing option A would be the best resource for your research report on giant pandas of China.

Yes, you're right -- A -- and the giant pandas are no longer endangered.

You are welcome, Dejavu.