What are the fundamental values of each of these health systems: The system In Mexico, the system in Canada, the system in the United Kingdom, and the system in the United States?
I think it has to do with comparison of the healthcare systems in Canada and the United States is often made by government, public health and public policy analysts.
Not to sure the right response, help?!
I don't know much about Mexico, so read this article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Mexico
Canada and the U.K. value health care for all of their citizens. Taxes support equal health care for everyone.
The U.S. operates on the free enterprise system in which companies make as much money as possible. This policy leaves many people underinsured because of the high cost of medical care and insurance.
To determine the fundamental values of each healthcare system, we can start by looking at some key characteristics and principles that underpin each system. Keep in mind that this is a general analysis and there may be variations within each country's healthcare system.
1. Mexico:
The healthcare system in Mexico is a mix of public and private sectors. Some of the fundamental values of the Mexican healthcare system include:
- Universal access: The goal is to provide healthcare services to all citizens, regardless of their ability to pay.
- Social solidarity: The system aims to promote equity by redistributing resources from higher-income individuals to those with lower incomes.
- Decentralization: Healthcare responsibilities are divided across different levels of government to ensure efficient and effective service delivery.
2. Canada:
The Canadian healthcare system, often referred to as Medicare, is publicly funded and operates under the principles of the Canada Health Act. Key values of the Canadian healthcare system include:
- Universal accessibility: All Canadian residents have access to medically necessary healthcare services, regardless of their ability to pay.
- Publicly funded: Healthcare services are funded through general tax revenues, ensuring that access to care is based on need rather than the ability to pay.
- Comprehensiveness: The system aims to provide a wide range of medically necessary services, including hospital care, physician services, and prescription drugs (varying by province).
3. United Kingdom:
The National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom is a publicly funded system that provides healthcare services to all residents. The fundamental values of the UK healthcare system include:
- Universality: The NHS provides comprehensive care to all UK residents, regardless of ability to pay.
- Equality: The system aims to reduce health inequalities by providing equitable access to healthcare services.
- Publicly funded and provided: Healthcare services are funded through general taxation, and the majority of services are provided by publicly owned NHS facilities.
4. United States:
The healthcare system in the United States is a complex mix of public and private sectors. It is primarily market-based, and the values of the system can vary due to a lack of centralized structure. Some key characteristics include:
- Private health insurance: The majority of Americans obtain health insurance coverage through private insurers or employer-sponsored plans.
- Emphasis on individual responsibility: The system places greater responsibility on individuals to secure their own insurance coverage and healthcare services.
- High cost and variability: The U.S. healthcare system generally has higher costs and can exhibit significant variation in coverage and access to care.
It's worth noting that these are general characteristics and values of each healthcare system, and there may be additional nuances and complexities within each country's system. Furthermore, healthcare values and priorities can evolve over time due to changes in policies and societal expectations.