Read statements (a) through (d) and identify any statement(s) that is irrelevant to the claim.


(a) It is unfair to expect victims to bear the cost of someone else’s negligence.
(b) Costs to victims arise as a result of the action of the drunk driver.
(c) A policy of compelling victim compensation for collisions caused by drunk drivers would reduce the incidence of repeat drunk driving offenses.
(d) Compelling compensation is only just where there is intent to injure on the part of the injuring party.

I think (d) is irrelevant to the claim. Am I right?

I agree. :) Good work.

Reed are you sure? i think its A & C

To determine if statement (d) is irrelevant to the claim, we need to understand the claim being made. The claim seems to be about whether or not it is fair to expect victims to bear the cost of someone else's negligence, specifically in cases involving drunk drivers.

Statement (d) discusses the idea of compelling compensation only in cases where there is intent to injure on the part of the injuring party. This statement is not directly related to the fairness of expecting victims to bear the cost of someone else's negligence. Therefore, it can be considered irrelevant to the claim.

So, your answer is correct. Statement (d) can be identified as irrelevant to the claim.