What are the checks on the power of the judiciary? Are they potent and easily invoked or weak and difficult to invoke?

The judiciary is appointed by the president with the consent of Congress. Although they must follow the Constitution, they are still human and sometimes lean toward popular opinion.

The power of the judiciary is checked and balanced through a variety of mechanisms to ensure accountability and prevent any single branch of government from becoming too powerful. Here are some key checks on the power of the judiciary:

1. Constitutional Limits: The judiciary's power is defined by the constitution, which sets forth the scope of their authority. Any action that exceeds these constitutional limits can be challenged and struck down.

2. Judicial Review: The concept of judicial review allows the judiciary to review and interpret laws passed by the legislative branch. If a law is deemed unconstitutional, the judiciary can declare it invalid.

3. Appointments: Judges are typically appointed by the executive branch (such as the president in the United States). This process provides an opportunity for the executive to influence the judiciary. However, the appointment process often involves checks and balances, such as nomination and approval by the legislative branch, to prevent abuses of power.

4. Legislative Oversight: The judiciary is subject to oversight by the legislative branch. This includes the power to impeach and remove judges, modify the jurisdiction of courts, or even establish additional courts.

5. Public Scrutiny: The judiciary operates in the public eye, and its decisions can be subject to public criticism. This scrutiny helps ensure that judges remain impartial and accountable to the people.

Now, regarding the potency and ease of invoking these checks on the judiciary's power, it can vary depending on the country and its legal system. In many democratic nations, these checks are designed to be strong and effective, providing significant safeguards against abuses of power. However, the actual implementation and effectiveness of these checks can be influenced by various factors, including political dynamics, institutional independence, and public support for the rule of law. In some cases, checks on the judiciary's power may face challenges or be subject to external pressures, making them more difficult to invoke.