Compare and contrast Azar Nafisi's "Reading in tehran" work to Frederick Douglass " Learning to Read and Write" work. I've read both but I'm not sure what to write for contrast. They both Had No freedom, social obligations and Strived for Education. I need to Write an Introduction and state how theyre work compare and contrast.

Please help.

I also have questions to help guide my outline. " what obstacles do the girls overcome to join Nafisi's class? How do the difficulties Douglass face compare to those Nafisis students faced?"

I did make a list of their similarities and differences.

Similarities:
No freedom,Social Obligations & strived for education
- Frederick Was born into slavery
- Nafisis Students were born into a generation
With restrictions specifically on females

Differences:
-Douglass taught himself to read and write
Ex: He would trade bread to little kids in return for knowledge.
- Azar Nafisi's Students were able to attend Schools and Unviserities but were restricted from reading certain books because of their content ( condone adultery )
- Douglass read " Colombian orator" which formed the basis for his later skills as a public lecturer. And also made him detest his slavors
- Nafisis students discuss works of literature ( pride and prejudice, madame bovary, etc.)and linked their themes to memories of life in Iran before, during and after the Iranian revolution.

Not sure of the third difference

third difference: learning to read was in a culture discriminated by race, reading about sex was discriminated by gender (and possibly religion).

very good examples and all are 100% true

I haven't read in Tehran, but from the sound of it, I can guess it and Douglass' book were both banned by authorities, and socially dangerous books, and one could draw many similarites from that. In the time of each book, one could go to jail for just having the books.

Comparison = how they're similar

Contrast = how they're different

Have you brainstormed or listed their differences? That's where you must start since you already have stated their similarities.

However, I really don't know how anyone can possibly write an introduction for a paper not yet written! You really need to have a thesis statement and the first draft of the interior paragraphs before you can write a decent introduction.

To compare and contrast Azar Nafisi's "Reading in Tehran" and Frederick Douglass's "Learning to Read and Write," you can focus on several key aspects: the historical context, the authors' experiences with education, their motivation for learning, and the impact of literature on their lives.

To begin your introduction, you may want to provide some background information about the time periods and settings in which these works were written. "Reading in Tehran" takes place in Iran during the Islamic Revolution, where the author, Azar Nafisi, faces restrictions on personal freedom and challenges due to social obligations. On the other hand, "Learning to Read and Write" by Frederick Douglass recounts his experiences as a slave in the United States during the 19th century, where he also lacked personal freedom and faced social constraints.

In terms of education, both Nafisi and Douglass have limited access to formal learning opportunities. Nafisi, as a female during the Islamic Revolution, encounters significant restrictions on education for women. Douglass, as a slave, is deprived of any formal education. Despite these obstacles, both authors are determined to educate themselves.

Their motivations for seeking education differ in some ways. Nafisi's desire for knowledge and literature stems from a longing for intellectual freedom and a means to resist the oppressive regime in Tehran. Douglass, on the other hand, views education as a path to personal freedom and self-identity, hoping to break free from the dehumanizing effects of slavery.

While both Nafisi and Douglass strive to obtain an education, they differ in the means through which they achieve it. Nafisi chooses to form a secret book club with a group of young women, where they study and discuss forbidden Western literature. Douglass, on the other hand, manages to teach himself to read and write through perseverance and resourcefulness, often by learning from others or through unauthorized reading and writing practices.

Furthermore, literature plays a significant role in both Nafisi's and Douglass's lives. Through literature, they find solace, inspiration, and a means to cope with their oppression. It becomes an intellectual space where they can explore ideas, challenge societal norms, and assert their individuality.

In summary, while Azar Nafisi's "Reading in Tehran" and Frederick Douglass's "Learning to Read and Write" share similarities in terms of the lack of personal freedom, social obligations, and the pursuit of education, they differ in the historical contexts, motivations for learning, and methods of education. Additionally, literature serves as an empowering tool for both authors. By examining these similarities and differences, you can analyze the greater themes and messages conveyed in their respective works.