one more question.i have to compare the class structure of japan and europe during feudalism. Europe was royals, nobility,manor lords, and serfs right? What was Japan? and am i leaving anything out of the Europe one?

thank you!

If some one would actually give some answers instead of talking 🙄

You left out the merchants and clergy from the European list.

Japan:
Emperor, Shogun, samurai, merchants, peasants -- and priests in there, too, depending on the religion (Buddhism, Shinto, ...)
(Broken Link Removed)

This site has the feudal caste system. However, there also was a merchant class that is not mentioned.

http://library.thinkquest.org/10949/fief/lofeudal.html

This site gives the Japanese system
(Broken Link Removed)

In order to compare the class structure of Japan and Europe during feudalism, let's start with Europe first. You have correctly mentioned some of the major social classes in Europe during feudalism. The feudal society in Europe generally consisted of the following classes:

1. Royals or Monarchs: At the top of the social hierarchy were the kings and queens who held ultimate political power. They owned vast amounts of land and had the authority to grant fiefs to noble families.

2. Nobility: Below the royals were the nobles, who held great influence and power in society. They were granted estates or fiefs by the monarch and had their own vassals. The nobles were expected to offer military support and loyalty in exchange for land.

3. Manor Lords: Manor lords were the high-ranking vassals of the nobles. They were responsible for governing and protecting smaller areas of land, known as manors. Manor lords oversaw the daily affairs of their manors and collected taxes from the peasants who lived there.

4. Serfs: At the bottom of the social hierarchy were the serfs, who were bound to the land and had limited rights. Serfs worked on the manor lands and were obligated to provide labor, pay taxes, and give a portion of their produce to the manor lords. They were not considered slaves, but their freedom was significantly restricted.

Turning to Japan, the class structure during feudalism was somewhat different:

1. Emperor: The Emperor was the highest authority in Japan, regarded as a figurehead with limited political power during feudal times. The Emperor was considered sacred and symbolic rather than directly involved in governance.

2. Shogun: The Shogun held the real political and military power in Japan. They were military commanders who acted as de facto rulers. The position was mainly hereditary, and the Shoguns controlled the samurai warriors and managed the central government.

3. Daimyo: The Daimyo were powerful feudal lords who controlled large territories called domains. They were granted these territories by the Shogun and had subordinate samurai vassals. Daimyo were responsible for ruling their domains, collecting taxes, and providing military support to the Shogun when required.

4. Samurai: The samurai were the noble warriors who served as the military class in Japan. They were retainers of the Daimyo and had their own vassals called vassal samurai. The samurai held high esteem and adhered to a strict code of conduct known as Bushido.

5. Peasants: The majority of the population in Japan consisted of peasants who worked the land owned by the Daimyo and paid taxes to them. Peasants had limited social status but were essential for agricultural production.

To summarize, the class structure in Europe during feudalism included royals, nobility, manor lords, and serfs, whereas Japan had an Emperor, Shogun, Daimyo, samurai, and peasants. It's important to note that these descriptions provide a general overview, and there were variations within each societal structure depending on the specific region and time period.