What specific aspects of the Stanford Prison Experiment made it ethically unacceptable. please help

What subj is this?

One is that they broke the rules theyve imposed--the guards beating the so played prisoners

The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted in 1971 by psychologist Philip Zimbardo, was a controversial study that aimed to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power and authority on individuals. While the study aimed to investigate important aspects of human behavior, there were several ethical issues that make it widely considered to be unacceptable by today's standards.

Here are some specific aspects of the Stanford Prison Experiment that were deemed ethically unacceptable:

1. Lack of Informed Consent: Participants in the study were not fully informed about the nature and potential consequences of the experiment. They were only given limited details about the study, and their consent may not have been truly informed.

2. Psychological Harm: The participants, who were randomly assigned as either prisoners or guards, experienced significant psychological harm during the experiment. The guards exhibited abusive and dehumanizing behavior towards the prisoners, causing extreme distress and anxiety. The study did not sufficiently prioritize the well-being and mental health of the participants.

3. Absence of Debriefing: Although participants eventually found out they were part of an experiment, the lack of immediate debriefing after the study may have failed to provide necessary support, clarify any misunderstandings, and address potential harm caused.

4. Lack of Independent Oversight: The study was conducted without adequate supervision by independent observers. Zimbardo himself took on the role of prison superintendent, leading to a conflict of interest and potential bias in allowing the unethical behavior to continue.

5. Questionable Termination: The experiment was intended to last for two weeks, but it had to be terminated after only six days due to the increasingly harmful behavior of the guards. The decision to continue the experiment despite the clear signs of psychological distress and abuse suggests a lack of consideration for the well-being of the participants.

It's important to note that the ethical standards and guidelines for conducting research have evolved significantly since the time of the Stanford Prison Experiment. Contemporary research ethics prioritize informed consent, participant well-being, protection from harm, and the presence of proper oversight to prevent unethical practices.