Do you think our country's history would be different if the Articles of Confederation had remained as our constitution?
Yes, I do think our country's history would be different if the Articles had remained as our constitution. Being that this government was so weak there is no protection for each state which means they will probably be taken over by French or British rule. Instead of one nation you would have thirteen separate countries to negotiate their own treaties. There would be a much greater chance of currency being counterfeited with each state. There would be no trade since each state refused to accept any currency from any other state. With a national government lacking the means to raise funds for essential services who would risk investing in any state that could not regulate its own economy. With no funds there is no national defense to establish and maintain an armed force for protection from those that want to rebel whether it be within the state or from outside sources.
Since this is your conclusion and a hypothetical that you're describing, you need to change some verb tenses. Make sure you are using "could" and "would" throughout.
"Being that" is a very clumsy way to begin a sentence. How can you rephrase that and make it smoother?
Get rid of all instances of "you" and rephrase.
You also need to give reasons why you have come to each conclusion. For example, you state that currency would have been counterfeited, but then you move on to the next idea without explaining WHY you believe the counterfeiting would have happened. Go through each of your ideas and make sure you have explained WHY you believe that would have happened.
Re-post if you need more input.
To analyze and provide a more informed answer to your question, we can consider the following points:
1. Weak central government: The Articles of Confederation established a decentralized system where the central government had limited power. This meant that each state had substantial sovereignty and could act independently. Consequently, it would be challenging for the central government to enforce laws uniformly or make decisions that would benefit the entire nation.
2. Lack of national defense: Under the Articles of Confederation, there was no provision for a standing army or centralized defense system. This could leave the individual states vulnerable to external threats, such as foreign invasions. The absence of a strong national defense could result in conflicts between states or even their colonial powers.
3. Difficulty in raising funds: The central government under the Articles of Confederation had limited authority to levy taxes and regulate commerce. This often led to financial instability and difficulty in raising funds for essential services. Without a centralized economic system, there would likely be a lack of uniform and stable currency, hampering trade and economic prosperity.
4. Inefficient decision-making: With each state having its own sovereignty, it would be challenging to reach consensus on issues that required collective decision-making, such as foreign policy or interstate commerce. Disagreements among the states could result in a lack of cohesive action and hinder the development of the nation as a whole.
Considering these factors, it is likely that the United States would have faced significant challenges and potentially a different outcome in its history if the Articles of Confederation had remained as the country's constitution. It's crucial to note that this is a speculative assessment, as it is impossible to accurately predict the precise course of events that would have transpired under such circumstances.